BACKGROUND: CagA seropositivity is closely associated with that of vacuolating cytotoxin (VacA). Helicobacter pylori strains positive for both VacA and CagA were reported to be strongly associated with peptic ulcer disease. Different results reporting that cagA gene is not associated with more serious diseases, lowers the importance of CagA protein as a marker. In this study, CagA seropositivity is examined in Turkish peptic ulcer and nonulcer dyspepsia patients; histopathologic scores of CagA (+) and CagA (-) groups were compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty consecutive patients (one gastric ulcer, 13 duodenal ulcer and 46 nonulcer dyspepsia) (mean age 40.9 +/- 14.7; 33 women, 27 men) with dyspeptic complaints who underwent upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy were included. Biopsies from the antrum and corpus were used for histopathologic examination and for rapid urease test. H. pylori-negative patients comprised the control group. Histopathologic findings were graded using a previously described grading system (for inflammation, activity, atrophy, intestinal metaplasia and H. pylori, grades from 0 to 3 were used to quantify the findings). In H. pylori-positive patients, antibodies against CagA protein were determined using an ELISA METHOD: RESULTS: H. pylori was (+) in 46 patients. One duodenal ulcer and 13 nonulcer dyspepsia patients were negative for H. pylori. CagA positivity is significantly higher in peptic ulcer patients [12/12] than in nonulcer dyspepsia patients [25/33]. While inflammation, activity and atrophy scores were significantly higher in CagA positive patients, intestinal metaplasia and H. pylori load scores were not. Although the histopathologic scores in controls were lower than CagA (-) group, statistical significance was observed only in inflammation and intestinal metaplasia scores. CONCLUSION: Development of more prominent gastritis and severe atrophy in CagA (+) patients is an indicator of the importance of CagA rather than H. pylori load. Therefore, we suggest that nonulcer dyspepsia patients should also be tested for CagA status along with the tests for H. pylori status; and a positive CagA testing should be considered as an indication for eradication treatment. If CagA is negative, further assesment should be performed to decide whether or not to treat the patient.
BACKGROUND:CagA seropositivity is closely associated with that of vacuolating cytotoxin (VacA). Helicobacter pylori strains positive for both VacA and CagA were reported to be strongly associated with peptic ulcer disease. Different results reporting that cagA gene is not associated with more serious diseases, lowers the importance of CagA protein as a marker. In this study, CagA seropositivity is examined in Turkish peptic ulcer and nonulcer dyspepsiapatients; histopathologic scores of CagA (+) and CagA (-) groups were compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty consecutive patients (one gastric ulcer, 13 duodenal ulcer and 46 nonulcer dyspepsia) (mean age 40.9 +/- 14.7; 33 women, 27 men) with dyspeptic complaints who underwent upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy were included. Biopsies from the antrum and corpus were used for histopathologic examination and for rapid urease test. H. pylori-negative patients comprised the control group. Histopathologic findings were graded using a previously described grading system (for inflammation, activity, atrophy, intestinal metaplasia and H. pylori, grades from 0 to 3 were used to quantify the findings). In H. pylori-positive patients, antibodies against CagA protein were determined using an ELISA METHOD: RESULTS:H. pylori was (+) in 46 patients. One duodenal ulcer and 13 nonulcer dyspepsiapatients were negative for H. pylori. CagA positivity is significantly higher in peptic ulcerpatients [12/12] than in nonulcer dyspepsiapatients [25/33]. While inflammation, activity and atrophy scores were significantly higher in CagA positive patients, intestinal metaplasia and H. pylori load scores were not. Although the histopathologic scores in controls were lower than CagA (-) group, statistical significance was observed only in inflammation and intestinal metaplasia scores. CONCLUSION: Development of more prominent gastritis and severe atrophy in CagA (+) patients is an indicator of the importance of CagA rather than H. pylori load. Therefore, we suggest that nonulcer dyspepsiapatients should also be tested for CagA status along with the tests for H. pylori status; and a positive CagA testing should be considered as an indication for eradication treatment. If CagA is negative, further assesment should be performed to decide whether or not to treat the patient.
Authors: Yusuf Erzin; Sibel Altun; Ahmet Dobrucali; Mustafa Aslan; Sibel Erdamar; Ahmet Dirican; Murat Tuncer; Bekir Kocazeybek Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2006-11-14 Impact factor: 5.742