Literature DB >> 11422305

Gastroesophageal reflux disease: clinical, endoscopic, and intraluminal esophageal pH monitoring evaluation.

A Nasi1, J P Filho, B Zilberstein, I Cecconello, J J Gama-Rodrigues, H W Pinotti.   

Abstract

One hundred and twenty-two patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease were studied (90 with and 32 without esophagitis) with the objective of analyzing possible differences between those with and without esophagitis. Evaluation consisted of clinical interview, endoscopy of the high digestive tract, esophageal manometry, and pH monitoring. There was no significant difference between the groups in age, sex, or symptoms. The incidence of hiatal hernia was greater in the group with esophagitis. Although the frequency of motor changes was similar, the type of anomaly was different. The reflux pattern was very similar in both groups. Therefore, the concept of reflux disease, esophagitis, and pathological reflux still needs a broader definition for greater diagnostic precision and for comparing the results of different studies on the subject. Normal reflux (confirmed using pH esophageal monitoring) in 12.2% of patients with esophagitis suggests that other factors are implicated in the etiology of the disease besides those measured using this examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11422305     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2001.00130.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  7 in total

1.  Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication in patients with nonerosive reflux disease. Long-term quality-of-life assessment and surgical outcome.

Authors:  T Kamolz; F A Granderath; U M Schweiger; R Pointner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-02-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  [Nonerosive and erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease. Long-term results of laparoscopic anterior semifundoplication].

Authors:  I Gockel; A Heintz; M Domeyer; W Kneist; T T Trinh; T Junginger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease and mild degree of esophagitis: comparison of symptoms endoscopic, manometric and pH-metric patterns.

Authors:  Michele Grande; Pierpaolo Sileri; Grazia Maria Attinà; Elisabetta De Luca; Paolo Ciano; Carolina Ilaria Ciangola; Federica Cadeddu
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 2.754

4.  Pre and Post-Operative Ph-Metry in Videolaparoscopic Surgery for Gastro Oesophageal Reflux Disease.

Authors:  A Garzi; G Ardimento; U Ferrentino; S Brongo; R M Di Crescenzo; E Calabrò; M S Rubino; B Malamisura; E Clemente
Journal:  Transl Med UniSa       Date:  2019-01-12

5.  The frequency of gastroesophageal reflux when radiofrequency catheter ablation procedures for atrial fibrillation under general anesthesia with a supraglottic device: Observational pilot study.

Authors:  Jin Hee Ahn; Jiyeon Park; Jae Seong Jo; Sung Hyun Lee; Young Keun On; Kyoung-Min Park; Eun Jeong Oh; Justin Sangwook Ko; Ji Seon Jeong
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Definition of Mucosal Breaks in the Era of Magnifying Endoscopy with Narrow-Band Imaging.

Authors:  Daisuke Kikuchi; Hiroyuki Odagiri; Yoshio Hoshihara; Yorinari Ochiai; Yugo Suzuki; Junnosuke Hayasaka; Masami Tanaka; Kosuke Nomura; Satoshi Yamashita; Akira Matsui; Toshiro Iizuka; Shu Hoteya
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 2.260

7.  Comparison of intragastric pressure between endotracheal tube and supraglottic airway devices in laparoscopic hepatectomy: A randomized, controlled, non-inferiority study.

Authors:  Jin Hee Ahn; Ji Seon Jeong; Se Hee Kang; Ji Eun Yeon; Eun A Cho; Gyu Sung Choi; Jong Man Kim; Gaab Soo Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.