K R Yeo1, W W Yeo. 1. Section of Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, University of Sheffield, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield. k.r.yeo@sheffield.ac.uk
Abstract
AIMS: To determine the effects of verapamil and diltiazem on simvastatin metabolism in human liver microsomes and to compare their inhibitory potencies and CYP3A4 inactivation parameters with those reported previously for mibefradil. METHODS: Simvastatin metabolism was investigated in human liver microsomes in the presence and absence of verapamil or diltiazem (0.1-250 microM). Kinetics of CYP3A4 inactivation by verapamil and diltiazem were determined using testosterone as the substrate. RESULTS: When verapamil was coincubated with simvastatin, IC50 values ranged from 23 to 26 microM for all major metabolites. The IC50 values ranged from 4.8 to 5.6 microM on preincubation of verapamil for 30 min in the presence of an NADPH-generating system. Corresponding IC50 values for diltiazem ranged from 110-127 microM and from 21-27 microM, respectively. Verapamil and diltiazem inhibited testosterone 6beta-hydroxylation in a time- and concentration-dependent manner, key features of mechanism-based inactivation. Values for the inactivation parameters kinact and KI were 0.15 +/- 0.04 min-1 (mean +/- s.d.) and 2.9 +/- 0.6 microM, respectively, for verapamil and 0.07 +/- 0.01 min-1 and 3.3 +/- 1.5 microM, respectively, for diltiazem. CONCLUSIONS: The IC50 values for coincubation of verapamil and diltiazem were 46- and 220-fold higher, respectively, than those reported previously for mibefradil, and 16- and 71-fold higher, respectively, for preincubation. Thus, the results of this study suggest that verapamil and diltiazem are less likely than mibefradil to cause acute drug interactions with simvastatin in vivo. However, verapamil and diltiazem are moderate mechanism-based inhibitors of CYP3A4 and therefore may still cause significant inhibition of simvastatin metabolism in vivo during chronic therapy.
AIMS: To determine the effects of verapamil and diltiazem on simvastatin metabolism in human liver microsomes and to compare their inhibitory potencies and CYP3A4 inactivation parameters with those reported previously for mibefradil. METHODS:Simvastatin metabolism was investigated in human liver microsomes in the presence and absence of verapamil or diltiazem (0.1-250 microM). Kinetics of CYP3A4 inactivation by verapamil and diltiazem were determined using testosterone as the substrate. RESULTS: When verapamil was coincubated with simvastatin, IC50 values ranged from 23 to 26 microM for all major metabolites. The IC50 values ranged from 4.8 to 5.6 microM on preincubation of verapamil for 30 min in the presence of an NADPH-generating system. Corresponding IC50 values for diltiazem ranged from 110-127 microM and from 21-27 microM, respectively. Verapamil and diltiazem inhibited testosterone 6beta-hydroxylation in a time- and concentration-dependent manner, key features of mechanism-based inactivation. Values for the inactivation parameters kinact and KI were 0.15 +/- 0.04 min-1 (mean +/- s.d.) and 2.9 +/- 0.6 microM, respectively, for verapamil and 0.07 +/- 0.01 min-1 and 3.3 +/- 1.5 microM, respectively, for diltiazem. CONCLUSIONS: The IC50 values for coincubation of verapamil and diltiazem were 46- and 220-fold higher, respectively, than those reported previously for mibefradil, and 16- and 71-fold higher, respectively, for preincubation. Thus, the results of this study suggest that verapamil and diltiazem are less likely than mibefradil to cause acute drug interactions with simvastatin in vivo. However, verapamil and diltiazem are moderate mechanism-based inhibitors of CYP3A4 and therefore may still cause significant inhibition of simvastatin metabolism in vivo during chronic therapy.
Authors: S Vickers; C A Duncan; K P Vyas; P H Kari; B Arison; S R Prakash; H G Ramjit; S M Pitzenberger; G Stokker; D E Duggan Journal: Drug Metab Dispos Date: 1990 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.922
Authors: Alexandra E Rätz Bravo; Lydia Tchambaz; Anita Krähenbühl-Melcher; Lorenzo Hess; Raymond G Schlienger; Stephan Krähenbühl Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2005 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: Shufeng Zhou; Sui Yung Chan; Boon Cher Goh; Eli Chan; Wei Duan; Min Huang; Howard L McLeod Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2005 Impact factor: 5.577
Authors: Ryan C Schoenfeld; David L Bourdet; Ken A Brameld; Elbert Chin; Javier de Vicente; Amy Fung; Seth F Harris; Eun K Lee; Sophie Le Pogam; Vincent Leveque; Jim Li; Alfred S-T Lui; Isabel Najera; Sonal Rajyaguru; Michael Sangi; Sandra Steiner; Francisco X Talamas; Joshua P Taygerly; Junping Zhao Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2013-10-10 Impact factor: 7.446