Literature DB >> 11421906

Variations of serum eosinophil cationic protein and tryptase, measured in serum and saliva, during the course of immediate allergic reactions to foods.

L Vila1, M L Sanz, G Sánchez-López, C García-Avilés, I Diéguez.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Subjective complaints and reactions after placebo administration during food challenges (FC) may make their outcome difficult to interpret. We determined serum ECP and tryptase as tryptase in saliva during FC, looking for markers to support challenge outcomes.
METHODS: Twelve patients with systemic reactions after food intake and nine presenting oral allergy syndrome (OAS) underwent skin tests; total and specific IgE determination; double-blind, placebo-controlled FC (DBPCFC); and open challenges. Blood samples were collected before and 1, 2, and 5 h after challenge and saliva before and 5, 30, and 60 min after challenge. ECP and tryptase were quantified by ImmunoCAP (Pharmacia-Upjohn, Sweden). Serum tryptase of > 10 microg/l was considered positive.
RESULTS: After positive DBPCFC (n = 8), ECP rose significantly (P < 0.05) at 1-h - 16.03 (12.8) microg/l (mean [standard deviation]) - and 2-h intervals - 17.56 (10.7) microg/l - compared to basal level of 9 (6.4) microg/l. After negative DBPCFC (n = 6), ECP increased from basal 9.63 (3.9) microg/l to 24.84 (14.17) microg/l at the 2-h time point. There were nonsignificant differences in ECP between patients with positive and negative FC. Two patients with positive challenge showed a tryptase level of >10 microg/l and only one patient with OAS showed 5.6 microg/l of tryptase 5 min after FC.
CONCLUSIONS: ECP and tryptase in serum and saliva were not useful markers for FC outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11421906     DOI: 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2001.056006568.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Allergy        ISSN: 0105-4538            Impact factor:   13.146


  5 in total

1.  Detection of Salivary Tryptase Levels in Children following Oral Food Challenges.

Authors:  Wouter W de Weger; Vibeke M Bruinenberg; Evelien M van der Lek; Jeroen H Gerrits; Lidy van Lente; Catherina E M Herpertz; Gerbrich N van der Meulen; Aline B Sprikkelman; Gerard H Koppelman; Arvid W A Kamps
Journal:  Int Arch Allergy Immunol       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 2.749

2.  Serological profiling reveals hsa-miR-451a as a possible biomarker of anaphylaxis.

Authors:  Wojciech Francuzik; Kristijan Pažur; Magdalena Dalke; Sabine Dölle-Bierke; Magda Babina; Margitta Worm
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2022-04-08

3.  Clinical Manifestations and Causes of Anaphylaxis. Analysis of 382 Cases from the Anaphylaxis Registry in West Pomerania Province in Poland.

Authors:  Iwona Poziomkowska-Gęsicka; Michał Kurek
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  TNF-alpha mediates eosinophil cationic protein-induced apoptosis in BEAS-2B cells.

Authors:  Kun-Che Chang; Chih-Wei Lo; Tan-Chi Fan; Margaret Dah-Tsyr Chang; Chih-Wen Shu; Chuan-Hsin Chang; Cheng-Ta Chung; Shun-Lung Fang; Chih-Chung Chao; Jaw-Ji Tsai; Yiu-Kay Lai
Journal:  BMC Cell Biol       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  The rate of epinephrine administration associated with allergy skin testing in a suburban allergy practice from 1997 to 2010.

Authors:  David A Swender; Leah R Chernin; Chris Mitchell; Theodore Sher; Robert Hostoffer; Haig Tcheurekdjian
Journal:  Allergy Rhinol (Providence)       Date:  2012-12-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.