Literature DB >> 11421522

Assistive technology outcomes research: challenges met and yet unmet.

M J Fuhrer1.   

Abstract

This article highlights the special requirements, achievements, and yet unmet challenges of assessing the outcomes of assistive technology services. The current status of this research is considered from the standpoint of developmental stages that seem to characterize many areas of outcomes research. Those stages include exhortation, sober appraisal, infrastructure building, and "getting on with it." The status of measuring assistive technology outcomes is described, and efforts to develop new measures are critically reviewed. Three as yet unmet challenges are discussed that are faced alike by assistive technology outcomes research and by rehabilitation outcomes research in general. They are as follows: (1) operationalizing a multiple-stakeholder approach to outcomes research; (2) formulating adequate treatment theories; and (3) creating shared databases.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11421522     DOI: 10.1097/00002060-200107000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0894-9115            Impact factor:   2.159


  6 in total

1.  Exploratory study of perceived quality of life with implanted standing neuroprostheses.

Authors:  Loretta M Rohde; Bette R Bonder; Ronald J Triolo
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2012

2.  Randomized controlled trial protocol feasibility: The Wheelchair Self-Efficacy Enhanced for Use (WheelSeeU).

Authors:  Krista L Best; William C Miller; Janice J Eng; François Routhier; Charles Goldsmith
Journal:  Can J Occup Ther       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.614

Review 3.  How a diverse research ecosystem has generated new rehabilitation technologies: Review of NIDILRR's Rehabilitation Engineering Research Centers.

Authors:  David J Reinkensmeyer; Sarah Blackstone; Cathy Bodine; John Brabyn; David Brienza; Kevin Caves; Frank DeRuyter; Edmund Durfee; Stefania Fatone; Geoff Fernie; Steven Gard; Patricia Karg; Todd A Kuiken; Gerald F Harris; Mike Jones; Yue Li; Jordana Maisel; Michael McCue; Michelle A Meade; Helena Mitchell; Tracy L Mitzner; James L Patton; Philip S Requejo; James H Rimmer; Wendy A Rogers; W Zev Rymer; Jon A Sanford; Lawrence Schneider; Levin Sliker; Stephen Sprigle; Aaron Steinfeld; Edward Steinfeld; Gregg Vanderheiden; Carolee Winstein; Li-Qun Zhang; Thomas Corfman
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 4.  How assistive technology use by individuals with disabilities impacts their caregivers: a systematic review of the research evidence.

Authors:  W Ben Mortenson; Louise Demers; Marcus J Fuhrer; Jeffrey W Jutai; James Lenker; Frank DeRuyter
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.159

Review 5.  Smartphones-Based Assistive Technology: Accessibility Features and Apps for People with Visual Impairment, and its Usage, Challenges, and Usability Testing.

Authors:  Suraj Singh Senjam; Souvik Manna; Covadonga Bascaran
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2021-11-27

6.  Cross-Cultural Validation of Quebec User Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 for Spanish Population (QUEST-2.0 ES).

Authors:  Joao Guerreiro; Estíbaliz Jiménez-Arberas; Patricia Porto Trillo; Olalla Vilar Figueira; Pedro Saénz-López Buñuel; Sandra Pais; José Tierra Orta; Thais Pousada García
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 4.614

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.