Literature DB >> 11421516

H reflex and F wave latencies to soleus normal values and side-to-side differences.

J A Strakowski1, D D Redd, E W Johnson, W S Pease.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Electromyographers must reliably differentiate between H reflexes and F waves when recording from the soleus muscle in the evaluation of S1 radiculopathy. The use of F waves in root-level injuries is questioned, whereas H reflexes have shown value in the evaluation of S1 radiculopathy. We studied the relationship between the tibial H reflex and F wave latencies in the limbs of 40 subjects.
DESIGN: After recording the H wave latency, we changed the gain to 200 microV/cm and increased the stimulation to supramaximal for ten additional responses without moving the recording or stimulating electrodes. We also calculated the predicted H wave latency with the standard formula. Forty subjects, mean age 32 yr, consented and participated.
RESULTS: The mean of the average F wave was 1.76 ms longer than the ipsilateral H reflex latency. The mean side-to-side difference of the average F wave was 0.56 ms. The H reflex latency side-to-side difference was 0.36 ms.
CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that the average F wave latencies have a predictive value in the clinical context similar to the H reflex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11421516     DOI: 10.1097/00002060-200107000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0894-9115            Impact factor:   2.159


  2 in total

1.  The reliability of a method for measuring the anterior cruciate ligament-hamstring reflex: an objective assessment of functional knee instability.

Authors:  Markus Schoene; Christoph Spengler; Baerbel Fahrbacher; Julia Hartmann; Marc Melnyk; Benedikt Friemert
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Effects of age and leg length upon central loop of the gastrocnemius-soleus H-reflex latency.

Authors:  Shahram Sadeghi; Mohammadrezaalavian Ghavanini; Alireza Ashraf; Peyman Jafari
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2004-09-03       Impact factor: 2.474

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.