Literature DB >> 11420625

Comparison of computed tomography with conventional radiography for midfacial fractures.

R Tanrikulu1, B Erol.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical effectiveness of computed tomography (CT) with conventional radiography in midfacial fractures.
METHODS: The conventional radiographs (CM) and CT scans of 40 consecutive patients with complex midfacial fractures were assessed independently by two examiners. The number and site of fractures of the orbit, zygoma and maxilla were compared by the Wilcoxon Matched Pairs Signed Rank test. The best method for classification of the fracture was determined.
RESULTS: Coronal CT (CCT) proved superior in the diagnosis of orbital fractures (P<0.001). There was no significant difference between any of the imaging methods for fractures of the zygoma. Axial CT (ACT) was the most effective method in imaging of maxillary fractures (ACT-CM; P<0.001, ACT-CCT; P<0.01). CCT was the most useful in classification of orbital and maxillary fracture.
CONCLUSION: CCT is superior to CM for the assessment of complex midface fractures

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11420625     DOI: 10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  7 in total

1.  Mandibular fracture patterns consistent with posterior maxillary fractures involving the posterior maxillary sinus, pterygoid plate or both: CT characteristics.

Authors:  T Imai; S Sukegawa; T Kanno; G Fujita; N Yamamoto; Y Furuki; M Michizawa
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Significance of post-traumatic maxillary sinus fluid, or lack of fluid, in a level II trauma population.

Authors:  Andrew Friedman; Judah Burns; Meir H Scheinfeld
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2015-09-03

3.  Trends of CT use in the adult emergency department in a tertiary academic hospital of Korea during 2001-2010.

Authors:  Hye Yeon Oh; Eun Young Kim; Jinseong Cho; Hyuk Jun Yang; Jeong Ho Kim; Hyung Sik Kim; Hye-Young Choi
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  Diagnostic tools in maxillofacial fractures: Is there really a need of three-dimensional computed tomography?

Authors:  Sheerin Shah; Sanjeev K Uppal; Rajinder K Mittal; Ramneesh Garg; Kavita Saggar; Rishi Dhawan
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2016 May-Aug

5.  Tissue Engineering in Maxillary Bone Defects.

Authors:  Azizollah Khodakaram-Tafti; Davood Mehrabani; Hanieh Shaterzadeh-Yazdi; Barbad Zamiri; Mahsa Omidi
Journal:  World J Plast Surg       Date:  2018-01

6.  Diagnostic performance of brain computed tomography to detect facial bone fractures.

Authors:  Duk Ho Kim; Yoon Hee Choi; Seong Jong Yun; Sun Hwa Lee
Journal:  Clin Exp Emerg Med       Date:  2018-06-29

7.  Computed tomography imaging strategies and perspectives in orbital fractures.

Authors:  Denise Takehana Dos Santos; Jefferson Xavier Oliveira; Michael Walter Vannier; Marcelo Gusmão Paraíso Cavalcanti
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.698

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.