Literature DB >> 11420465

Prospective multicenter evaluation of the morphometric D-score for prediction of the outcome of endometrial hyperplasias.

J P Baak1, A Ørbo, P J van Diest, M Jiwa, P de Bruin, M Broeckaert, W Snijders, P J Boodt, G Fons, C Burger, R H Verheijen, P W Houben, H S The, P Kenemans.   

Abstract

Prospective multicenter evaluation of the WHO classification and the morphometric D-score to predict endometrial hyperplasia cancer progression. In 132 endometrial hyperplasias WHO classification was performed by two experienced gynecologic pathologists. The D-score was assessed blindly by technicians in a routine diagnostic setting. Development of endometrial carcinoma during a 1-10-year follow-up was used as the end point. Eleven of 132 patients (8%), 10 of 61 (16%) atypical hyperplasias, and 1 of 71 (1%) nonatypical hyperplasias developed cancer. Twenty-six curettings had a D-score < or = 0 ("unfavorable" or endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia) of which 10 (38%) developed cancer. None of the 86 cases with a D-score > 1 ("favorable") and one of the 20 (5%) cases with 0 < D-score < or = 1 ("uncertain") developed cancer. Sensitivity of the D-score was 100%, specificity 82%, the positive and negative predictive values were 38% and 100%, respectively. These values are similar to those in three prior retrospective D-score studies but higher than the WHO values (which are 91%, 58%, 16%, and 99%, respectively). The D-score in endometrial hyperplasias is a more sensitive and specific marker for cancer prediction than the WHO classification, can be assessed in a routine clinical setting on standard hematoxylin and eosin sections (15-30 minutes per case), and is highly reproducible and cost-effective (U.S. $50 per case).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11420465     DOI: 10.1097/00000478-200107000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  9 in total

Review 1.  EIN and WHO94.

Authors:  J P A Baak; G L Mutter
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  [Precursor lesions of endometrial carcinoma: diagnostic approach and molecular pathology].

Authors:  S Lax
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  Prediction of endometrial carcinoma by subjective endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosis.

Authors:  Jonathan L Hecht; Tan A Ince; Jan P A Baak; Heather E Baker; Maryann W Ogden; George L Mutter
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 4.  The molecular genetics and morphometry-based endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia classification system predicts disease progression in endometrial hyperplasia more accurately than the 1994 World Health Organization classification system.

Authors:  Jan P Baak; George L Mutter; Stanley Robboy; Paul J van Diest; Anne M Uyterlinde; Anne Orbo; Juan Palazzo; Bent Fiane; Kjell Løvslett; Curt Burger; Feja Voorhorst; René H Verheijen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  The endometrial hyperplasias revisited.

Authors:  Efthimios Sivridis; Alexandra Giatromanolaki
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2008-08-23       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Clinicopathologic factors and nuclear morphometry as independent prognosticators in KIT-positive gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Sonja E Steigen; Bjørn Straume; Dmitry Turbin; Andy K W Chan; Samuel Leung; Torsten O Nielsen; Sigurd Lindal
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 2.479

7.  Decision Support System for Lymphoma Classification.

Authors:  Ahmed E-S Negm; Ahmed H Kandil; Osama A E-F Hassan
Journal:  Curr Med Imaging Rev       Date:  2017-02

Review 8.  New concepts for an old problem: the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia.

Authors:  Peter A Sanderson; Hilary O D Critchley; Alistair R W Williams; Mark J Arends; Philippa T K Saunders
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 15.610

9.  Levonorgestrel-impregnated intrauterine device as treatment for endometrial hyperplasia: a national multicentre randomised trial.

Authors:  A Orbo; Ab Vereide; M Arnes; I Pettersen; B Straume
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 6.531

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.