Literature DB >> 11420008

Imaging of cartilage and mimic muscles with MRI: anatomic study in healthy volunteers and patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate.

J Kleinheinz1, U Joos.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to visualize different soft tissues in the perioral, nasal, and paranasal region by means of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP).
DESIGN: In this descriptive study, images of different MRI systems were assessed and compared.
METHOD: MRI was applied in five consecutive patients operated on for UCLP who underwent secondary lip and nasal correction, two patients who had not had UCLP operations, and five healthy volunteers as controls. The mimic muscles, vessels, and nasal cartilages were evaluated.
RESULTS: It was possible to visualize different parts of the paranasal and perioral mimic muscles and their interlacement in the upper lip. The nasal cartilages were also visible, and the changes after operation were demonstrated.
CONCLUSIONS: MRI shows differentiated visualization of soft tissues in the cleft region and their changes after surgery. It is a valuable tool in the preoperative planning and postoperative follow-up in patients with UCLP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11420008     DOI: 10.1597/1545-1569_2001_038_0291_iocamm_2.0.co_2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J        ISSN: 1055-6656


  5 in total

1.  Electrophysiological method to examine muscle fiber architecture in the upper lip in cleft-lip patients.

Authors:  Johanna Radeke; Johannes Peter van Dijk; Ales Holobar; Bernd Georg Lapatki
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-01-19       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Tissue-plastinated vs. celloidin-embedded large serial sections in video, analog and digital photographic on-screen reproduction: a preliminary step to exact virtual 3D modelling, exemplified in the normal midface and cleft-lip and palate.

Authors:  Constantin A Landes; Frank Weichert; Philipp Geis; Katrin Wernstedt; Anja Wilde; Helga Fritsch; Mathias Wagner
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Comparison of Micro-Computed Tomography and Clinical Computed Tomography Protocols for Visualization of Nasal Cartilage Before Surgical Planning for Rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Rajeev C Saxena; Seth Friedman; Randall A Bly; Jeffrey Otjen; Adam M Alessio; Yangming Li; Blake Hannaford; Mark Whipple; Kris S Moe
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 4.611

Review 4.  Computational technology for nasal cartilage-related clinical research and application.

Authors:  Bing Shi; Hanyao Huang
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 6.344

5.  MRI and Additive Manufacturing of Nasal Alar Constructs for Patient-specific Reconstruction.

Authors:  Dafydd O Visscher; Maureen van Eijnatten; Niels P T J Liberton; Jan Wolff; Mark B M Hofman; Marco N Helder; J Peter W Don Griot; Paul P M van Zuijlen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.