Literature DB >> 11419830

A patient education program is cost-effective for preventing failure of endoscopic procedures in a gastroenterology department.

G Abuksis1, M Mor, N Segal, I Shemesh, I Morad, S Plaut, E Weiss, J Sulkes, G Fraser, Y Niv.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The growing use and complexity of endoscopy procedures in GI units has increased the need for good patient preparation. Earlier studies in this area have focused on the psychological benefits of patient education programs. The present study was directed at determining cost-effectiveness of a patient education program.
METHODS: A prospective, randomized, controlled design was used. The patient population consisted of 142 patients aged 18-90 yr referred for an endoscopy procedure. Ninety-one (64%) participated in a targeted educational session conducted by a dedicated departmental nurse (group 1), 38 (27%) did not (group 2), and 13 (9%) received telephonic instruction (group 3). Before the endoscopy, all patients completed a questionnaire covering background data, endoscopy-related variables, anxiety level, and satisfaction. Patient cooperation and success/failure of the procedure were documented by the attending nurse.
RESULTS: Male gender, previous endoscopy, and explanation from the referring physician were associated with a low level of anxiety (p < 0.05). There was a significant association between attendance in the education program and success of the endoscopy (p = 0.0009). Cancellations of procedures because of poor preparation occurred in 4.39% of group 1 in comparison with 26.31% and 15.38% of groups 2 and 3, respectively (p = 0.005). The overall cost of the procedure was reduced by 8.6%, 8.9%, and 5.5% for gastroscopy, colonoscopy, and sigmoidoscopy, respectively. All participants expressed satisfaction with the brochure.
CONCLUSION: A pre-endoscopy patient education program apparently increase patient compliance, thereby decreasing both the need for repeated examinations and their attendant costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11419830     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03872.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  35 in total

1.  Canadian Association of Gastroenterology consensus guidelines on safety and quality indicators in endoscopy.

Authors:  David Armstrong; Alan Barkun; Ron Bridges; Rose Carter; Chris de Gara; Catherine Dube; Robert Enns; Roger Hollingworth; Donald Macintosh; Mark Borgaonkar; Sylviane Forget; Grigorios Leontiadis; Jonathan Meddings; Peter Cotton; Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.522

2.  The comparison of dexmedetomidine and midazolam used for sedation of patients during upper endoscopy: A prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Yavuz Demiraran; Esin Korkut; Ali Tamer; Ilknur Yorulmaz; Buket Kocaman; Gulbin Sezen; Yusuf Akcan
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 3.  Gastroenterology services in the UK. The burden of disease, and the organisation and delivery of services for gastrointestinal and liver disorders: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  J G Williams; S E Roberts; M F Ali; W Y Cheung; D R Cohen; G Demery; A Edwards; M Greer; M D Hellier; H A Hutchings; B Ip; M F Longo; I T Russell; H A Snooks; J C Williams
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Patient compliance and suboptimal bowel preparation with split-dose bowel regimen in average-risk screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Stacy B Menees; H Myra Kim; Patricia Wren; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Grace H Elta; Stephanie Foster; Sheryl Korsnes; Brittany Graustein; Philip Schoenfeld
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: are preparatory interventions or conscious sedation effective? A randomized trial.

Authors:  Lucio Trevisani; Sergio Sartori; Piergiorgio Gaudenzi; Giuseppe Gilli; Giancarlo Matarese; Sergio Gullini; Vincenzo Abbasciano
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Cost-effectiveness of a standard intervention versus a navigated intervention on colorectal cancer screening use in primary care.

Authors:  David R Lairson; Melissa Dicarlo; Ashish A Deshmuk; Heather B Fagan; Randa Sifri; Nora Katurakes; James Cocroft; Jocelyn Sendecki; Heidi Swan; Sally W Vernon; Ronald E Myers
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Clinical outcomes associated with attempts to educate patients about lower endoscopy: a narrative review.

Authors:  John M Coombes; John F Steiner; David B Bekelman; Allan V Prochazka; Thomas D Denberg
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2008-06

8.  The influence of health literacy on comprehension of a colonoscopy preparation information leaflet.

Authors:  Samuel G Smith; Christian von Wagner; Lesley M McGregor; Laura M Curtis; Elizabeth A H Wilson; Marina Serper; Michael S Wolf
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  YouTube™ as a Source of Instructional Videos on Bowel Preparation: a Content Analysis.

Authors:  Adewale B Ajumobi; Mazyar Malakouti; Alexander Bullen; Hycienth Ahaneku; Tisha N Lunsford
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  Factors associated with patient absenteeism for scheduled endoscopy.

Authors:  Victor K Wong; Hong-Bin Zhang; Robert Enns
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.