C Aveline1, F Bonnet. 1. Département d'anesthésie-réanimation, hôpital Tenon, 4, rue de la Chine, 75970 Paris, France.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of epidural analgesia (EA) on the duration of labour and the mode of delivery. DATA SOURCES: A Medline computerised literature research was conducted from 1989 to 2000 including all the prospective studies comparing EA and systemic analgesia during labour. DATA SYNTHESIS: EA prolongs the first and second stages of labour and increases the rate of instrumental delivery, without neonatal side effects. EA is not responsible for dystocia and caesarean section rate is not increased by this mode of analgesia. The effect of combined spinal-epidural analgesia is comparable to the one of EA on the length of labour and the mode of delivery. Ropivacaine does not appear to be different from bupivacaine in that setting. The benefit of ambulation remains controversial since it does not reduce the incidence of instrumental delivery, compared to conventional EA with similarly diluted local anaesthetic solutions. CONCLUSIONS: Pain relief provided by EA combined to modification of obstetric management (amniotomy, oxytocin) does not impair the rate of caesarean section and dystocia.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of epidural analgesia (EA) on the duration of labour and the mode of delivery. DATA SOURCES: A Medline computerised literature research was conducted from 1989 to 2000 including all the prospective studies comparing EA and systemic analgesia during labour. DATA SYNTHESIS: EA prolongs the first and second stages of labour and increases the rate of instrumental delivery, without neonatal side effects. EA is not responsible for dystocia and caesarean section rate is not increased by this mode of analgesia. The effect of combined spinal-epidural analgesia is comparable to the one of EA on the length of labour and the mode of delivery. Ropivacaine does not appear to be different from bupivacaine in that setting. The benefit of ambulation remains controversial since it does not reduce the incidence of instrumental delivery, compared to conventional EA with similarly diluted local anaesthetic solutions. CONCLUSIONS:Pain relief provided by EA combined to modification of obstetric management (amniotomy, oxytocin) does not impair the rate of caesarean section and dystocia.
Authors: Leanne Jones; Mohammad Othman; Therese Dowswell; Zarko Alfirevic; Simon Gates; Mary Newburn; Susan Jordan; Tina Lavender; James P Neilson Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2012-03-14