Literature DB >> 11419223

Quantitative characterizations of speech rhythm: syllable-timing in Singapore English.

L E Ling1, E Grabe, F Nolan.   

Abstract

British English and Singapore English are said to differ in rhythmic patterning. British English is commonly described as stress-timed, but Singapore English is claimed to be syllable-timed. In the present paper, we explore the acoustic nature of the suggested cross-varietal difference. In directly comparable samples from British English and Singapore English, two types of acoustic measurements were taken; we calculated a variability index reflecting changes in vowel length over utterances, and measurements reflecting vowel quality. Our findings provide acoustic data which support the hypothesized cross-varietal difference in rhythmic patterning; we show (1) that successive vowel durations are more nearly equal in Singapore English than in British English, and (2) that reduced vowels pattern more peripherally in the F1/F2 formant space in Singapore English than in British English. We complete the paper with a comparison of our vowel variability index with a set of acoustic measures for rhythm proposed by Ramus, Nespor, and Mehler (1999), which focus on variability in vocalic and intervocalic intervals. We conclude that our variability index is more successful in capturing rhythmic differences than Ramus et al. (1999)'s measures, and that an application of our index to Ramus et al.'s intervocalic measure may provide a further diagnostic of rhythmic class.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11419223     DOI: 10.1177/00238309000430040301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Speech        ISSN: 0023-8309            Impact factor:   1.500


  33 in total

1.  Discriminating dysarthria type from envelope modulation spectra.

Authors:  Julie M Liss; Sue LeGendre; Andrew J Lotto
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Temporal organization of English clear and conversational speech.

Authors:  Rajka Smiljanić; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Rhythm, timing and the timing of rhythm.

Authors:  Amalia Arvaniti
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 1.759

4.  Common and distinct neural substrates for the perception of speech rhythm and intonation.

Authors:  Linjun Zhang; Hua Shu; Fengying Zhou; Xiaoyi Wang; Ping Li
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Lexical stress in childhood apraxia of speech: acoustic and kinematic findings.

Authors:  Hailey C Kopera; Maria I Grigos
Journal:  Int J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.484

6.  Speech rhythm: a metaphor?

Authors:  Francis Nolan; Hae-Sung Jeon
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Recognition memory for foreign language lexical stress.

Authors:  Lidia Suárez; Winston D Goh
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-08

8.  Acoustic Analyses and Intelligibility Assessments of Timing Patterns Among Chinese English Learners with Different Dialect Backgrounds.

Authors:  Hsueh Chu Chen
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2015-12

9.  Word-level prosodic measures and the differential diagnosis of apraxia of speech.

Authors:  Katarina L Haley; Adam Jacks
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 1.346

10.  Measures to Evaluate the Effects of DBS on Speech Production.

Authors:  Gary Weismer; Yana Yunusova; Kate Bunton
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.