Literature DB >> 11419161

MR enteroclysis protocol optimization: comparison between 3D FLASH with fat saturation after intravenous gadolinium injection and true FISP sequences.

N Gourtsoyiannis1, N Papanikolaou, J Grammatikakis, T Maris, P Prassopoulos.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to introduce the true fast imaging with steady-state precession (FISP) sequence for MR enteroclysis and compare it with the already used T1-weighted fast low-angle shot (FLASH) sequence. Twenty-one patients underwent both MR and conventional enteroclysis. The MR enteroclysis examination was performed after administration of an iso-osmotic water solution through a nasojejunal catheter and the following sequences were included: (a) true FISP; and (b) 3D FLASH with fat saturation after intravenous injection of 20 mg Buscopan or 1 mg glucagon and 0.1 mmol/kg gadolinium chelates. The true FISP sequence provided images with significantly fewer motion artifacts, whereas 3D FLASH was less sensitive to susceptibility and chemical shift artifacts. The homogeneity of endoluminal opacification, wall conspicuity, and distention of the small bowel were very good to excellent and the two sequences presented no statistically significant differences here. True FISP provided significantly better overall image quality than did 3D FLASH. The true FISP sequence can provide good anatomic demonstration of the small bowel on T2-like images and could be combined with T1-weighted FLASH images for an integrated protocol of MR enteroclysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11419161     DOI: 10.1007/s003300000805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  15 in total

1.  MR colonography with fecal tagging: comparison between 2D turbo FLASH and 3D FLASH sequences.

Authors:  Nickolas Papanikolaou; John Grammatikakis; Thomas Maris; Thomas Lauenstein; Panos Prassopoulos; Nicholas Gourtsoyiannis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-01-14       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  An eight-year prospective controlled study about the safety and diagnostic value of cardiac and non-cardiac 1.5-T MRI in patients with a conventional pacemaker or a conventional implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Lupo; Riccardo Cappato; Giovanni Di Leo; Francesco Secchi; Giacomo D E Papini; Sara Foresti; Hussam Ali; Guido M G De Ambroggi; Antonio Sorgente; Gianluca Epicoco; Paola M Cannaò; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Assessment of Crohn's disease in the small bowel: Prospective comparison of magnetic resonance enteroclysis with conventional enteroclysis.

Authors:  Gabriele Masselli; Emanuele Casciani; Elisabetta Polettini; Silvia Lanciotti; Luca Bertini; Gianfranco Gualdi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-06-24       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Malignant tumours of the small intestine: a review of histopathology, multidetector CT and MRI aspects.

Authors:  M Anzidei; A Napoli; C Zini; M A Kirchin; C Catalano; R Passariello
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Imaging of small intestinal Crohn's disease: comparison between MR enteroclysis and conventional enteroclysis.

Authors:  Nicholas C Gourtsoyiannis; John Grammatikakis; George Papamastorakis; John Koutroumbakis; Panos Prassopoulos; Maria Rousomoustakaki; Nickolas Papanikolaou
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  MR enteroclysis: imaging technique of choice in diagnosis of small bowel diseases.

Authors:  Bart M Wiarda; Ernst J Kuipers; Lex P J Houdijk; Hans A R E Tuynman
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Oral contrast agents for small bowel distension in MRI: influence of the osmolarity for small bowel distention.

Authors:  Waleed Ajaj; Mathias Goyen; Hubert Schneemann; Christiane Kuehle; Michael Nuefer; Stefan G Ruehm; Susanne C Goehde; Thomas C Lauenstein
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Oral contrast agents for small bowel MRI: comparison of different additives to optimize bowel distension.

Authors:  Waleed Ajaj; Susanne C Goehde; Hubert Schneemann; Stefan G Ruehm; Jörg F Debatin; Thomas C Lauenstein
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-22       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Dark lumen magnetic resonance colonography: comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal pathology.

Authors:  W Ajaj; G Pelster; U Treichel; F M Vogt; J F Debatin; S G Ruehm; T C Lauenstein
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Role of Magnetic Resonance Enterography in Differentiating between Fibrotic and Active Inflammatory Small Bowel Stenosis in Patients with Crohn's Disease.

Authors:  Francesca Fornasa; Chiara Benassuti; Luca Benazzato
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2011-06-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.