Literature DB >> 11418495

Neural networks distinguish between taste qualities based on receptor cell population responses.

B Varkevisser1, D Peterson, T Ogura, S C Kinnamon.   

Abstract

Response features of taste receptor cell action potentials were examined using an artificial neural network to determine whether they contain information about taste quality. Using the loose patch technique to record from hamster taste buds in vivo we recorded population responses of single fungiform papillae to NaCl (100 mM), sucrose (200 mM) and the synthetic sweetener NC-00274-01 (NC-01) (200 microM). Features of each response describing both burst and inter-burst characteristics were then presented to an artificial neural network for pairwise classification of taste stimuli. Responses to NaCl could be distinguished from those to both NC-01 and sucrose with accuracies of up to 86%. In contrast, pairwise comparisons between sucrose and NC-01 were not successful, scoring at chance (50%). Also, comparisons between two different concentrations of NaCl, 0.01 and 0.005 M, scored at chance. Pairwise comparisons using only those features that relate to the inter-burst behavior of the response (i.e. bursting rate) did not hinder the performance of the neural network as both sweeteners versus NaCl received scores of 75--85%. Comparisons using features corresponding to each individual burst scored poorly, receiving scores only slightly above chance. We then compared the sweeteners with varying concentrations of NaCl (0.1, 0.01, 0.005 and 0.001 M) using only those features corresponding to bursting rate within a 1 s time window. The neural network was capable of distinguishing between NaCl and NC-01 at all concentrations tested; while comparisons between NaCl and sucrose received high scores at all concentrations except 0.001 M. These results show that two different taste qualities can be distinguished from each other based solely on the bursting rates of action potentials in single taste buds and that this distinction is independent of stimulation intensity down to 0.001 M NaCl. These data suggest that action potentials in taste receptor cells may play a role in taste quality coding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11418495     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/26.5.499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  6 in total

1.  Identification and functional characterization of a voltage-gated chloride channel and its novel splice variant in taste bud cells.

Authors:  Liquan Huang; Jie Cao; Hong Wang; Lynn A Vo; Joseph G Brand
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-08-29       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Temporal coding mediates discrimination of "bitter" taste stimuli by an insect.

Authors:  John I Glendinning; Adrienne Davis; Meelu Rai
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Action potentials and ion conductances in wild-type and CALHM1-knockout type II taste cells.

Authors:  Zhongming Ma; Wint Thu Saung; J Kevin Foskett
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Contribution of different taste cells and signaling pathways to the discrimination of "bitter" taste stimuli by an insect.

Authors:  John I Glendinning; Adrienne Davis; Sudha Ramaswamy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Why do taste cells generate action potentials?

Authors:  Aurelie Vandenbeuch; Sue C Kinnamon
Journal:  J Biol       Date:  2009-04-28

Review 6.  Sensing Senses: Optical Biosensors to Study Gustation.

Authors:  Elena von Molitor; Katja Riedel; Mathias Hafner; Rüdiger Rudolf; Tiziana Cesetti
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 3.576

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.