Literature DB >> 11418252

Methods for priority setting among clinical preventive services.

M V Maciosek1, A B Coffield, J M McGinnis, J R Harris, M B Caldwell, S M Teutsch, D Atkins, J H Richland, A Haddix.   

Abstract

Methods used to compare the value of clinical preventive services based on two criteria-clinically preventable burden (CPB) and cost effectiveness (CE)-are described. A companion article provides rankings of clinical preventive services and discusses its uses for decision-makers; this article focuses on the methods, challenges faced, and solutions. The authors considered all types of data essential to measuring CPB and CE for services recommended by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and developed methods essential to ensuring valid comparisons of different services' relative value.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11418252     DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(01)00309-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  14 in total

1.  Primary care: is there enough time for prevention?

Authors:  Kimberly S H Yarnall; Kathryn I Pollak; Truls Østbye; Katrina M Krause; J Lloyd Michener
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  What comparative effectiveness research is needed? A framework for using guidelines and systematic reviews to identify evidence gaps and research priorities.

Authors:  Tianjing Li; S Swaroop Vedula; Roberta Scherer; Kay Dickersin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  [Screening: prerequisites].

Authors:  M Hoffmeister; U Haug; H Brenner
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 0.743

4.  Prevention Priorities: Guidance for Value-Driven Health Improvement.

Authors:  George Isham; Eduardo Sanchez; Warren A Jones; Steven Teutsch; Steven Woolf; Anne Haddix
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Automating the recognition and prioritization of needed preventive services: early results from the CHICA system.

Authors:  Paul Gene Biondich; Stephen M Downs; Vibha Anand; Aaron E Carroll
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2005

6.  Health Benefits and Cost-Effectiveness of Asymptomatic Screening for Hypertension and High Cholesterol and Aspirin Counseling for Primary Prevention.

Authors:  Steven P Dehmer; Michael V Maciosek; Amy B LaFrance; Thomas J Flottemesch
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 5.166

7.  Updated Priorities Among Effective Clinical Preventive Services.

Authors:  Michael V Maciosek; Amy B LaFrance; Steven P Dehmer; Dana A McGree; Thomas J Flottemesch; Zack Xu; Leif I Solberg
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  Estimated effects of potential interventions to prevent decreases in self-rated health among breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Mario Schootman; Anjali D Deshpande; Sandi Pruitt; Rebecca Aft; Donna B Jeffe
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.797

9.  The Prevention Index: using technology to improve quality assessment.

Authors:  Thomas M Vogt; Mikel Aickin; Faruque Ahmed; Mark Schmidt
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  When there is too much to do: how practicing physicians prioritize among recommended interventions.

Authors:  Timothy P Hofer; Judith K Zemencuk; Rodney A Hayward
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.