| Literature DB >> 11416835 |
D Udelson1, J L'Esperance, A M Morales, R Patel, I Goldstein.
Abstract
In order to further our understanding of the physiology of corporal veno-occlusion, we developed a theory of a possible contribution to corporal venous outflow resistance which occurs as the result of venule stretching with resultant luminal narrowing when penile volume increases during the erection process. We stretched non-biological tubes and rabbit abdominal vena cava segments, performed flow-based and volume-based experiments to calculate the magnitude of N, the newly defined 'stretch-associated luminal constrictability' factor. We solved for (R(s)/R(u)), the ratio of the venule fluid resistance in the stretched state (R(s)) to the unstretched state (R(u)), to quantify the projected increases in fluid resistance as well as Q.R(u) where Q is the subtunical venule flow rate. For a given tube, N was found to be essentially constant for different amounts of stretch. A theory was formulated which predicted R(s) and Q as a function of N, DeltaP (intracavernosal pressure increase); V(E)/V(F) (tunical distensibility); X (cavernosal expandability) and R(u). Based on the magnitude of N=2, this theory predicts that patients with the highest values of both V(E)/V(F) and X would have maximal R(s) values, approaching infinity (complete occlusion) at a low DeltaP near 5 mmHg. In contrast, patients with low values of both V(E)/V(F) (eg Peyronie's disease) and X (eg corporal fibrosis), would be predicted to have minimal R(s) values. For example, a hypothetical patient with the lowest values of V(E)/V(F) and X would yield R(s) values only approaching 7.9 times that of unstretched values at a DeltaP increase of 90 mmHg. We concluded to that stretch-associated venule resistance may occur as a result of decreased sub-tunical venule diameter and increased sub-tunical venule length. In individual patients, stretch-associated venule resistance may either dominate or be a minor component of the overall mechanism of corporal veno-occlusion.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2000 PMID: 11416835 DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900628
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Impot Res ISSN: 0955-9930 Impact factor: 2.896