Literature DB >> 11416165

Maternal effects and the evolution of aposematic signals.

E D Brodie1, A F Agrawal.   

Abstract

Aposematic signals that warn predators of the noxious qualities of prey gain their greatest selective advantage when predators have already experienced similar signals. Existing theory explains how such signals can spread through selective advantage after they are present at some critical frequency, but is unclear about how warning signals can be selectively advantageous when the trait is initially rare (i.e., when it first arises through mutation) and predators are naive. When aposematism is controlled by a maternal effect gene, the difficulty of initial rarity may be overcome. Unlike a zygotically expressed gene, a maternally expressed aposematism gene will be hidden from selection because it is not phenotypically expressed in the first individual with the mutation. Furthermore, the first individual carrying the new mutation will produce an entire family of aposematic offspring, thereby providing an immediate fitness advantage to this gene.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11416165      PMCID: PMC35437          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.141075998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  11 in total

1.  Maternal effect genes and the evolution of sociality in haplo-diploid organisms.

Authors:  M J Wade
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  The effects of predator learning, forgetting, and recognition errors on the evolution of warning coloration.

Authors:  M R Servedio
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  A diet-induced developmental polymorphism in a caterpillar.

Authors:  E Greene
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-02-03       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Evolutionary consequences of indirect genetic effects.

Authors:  J B Wolf; E D Brodie Iii; J M Cheverud; A J Moore; M J Wade
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-02-01       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  EVOLUTIONARY GENETICS OF OVIPOSITION PREFERENCE IN SWALLOWTAIL BUTTERFLIES.

Authors:  John N Thompson
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  THE MEASUREMENT OF SELECTION ON CORRELATED CHARACTERS.

Authors:  Russell Lande; Stevan J Arnold
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  SURVIVAL OF DISTASTEFUL INSECTS AFTER BEING ATTACKED BY NAIVE BIRDS: A REAPPRAISAL OF THE THEORY OF APOSEMATIC COLORATION EVOLVING THROUGH INDIVIDUAL SELECTION.

Authors:  Christer Wiklund; Torbjörn Järvi
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Higher survival of an aposematic than of a cryptic form of a distasteful bug.

Authors:  Birgitta Sillén-Tullberg
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Frequency-dependent predation, crypsis and aposematic coloration.

Authors:  J A Endler
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1988-07-06       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Chemical defense against predation in an insect egg.

Authors:  T Eisner; M Eisner; C Rossini; V K Iyengar; B L Roach; E Benedikt; J Meinwald
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  3 in total

1.  A role for phenotypic plasticity in the evolution of aposematism.

Authors:  Gregory A Sword
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Aposematism: what should our starting point be?

Authors:  Michael P Speed; Graeme D Ruxton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Intragroup and intragenomic conflict over chemical defense against predators.

Authors:  Rebekah Best; Graeme D Ruxton; Andy Gardner
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 2.912

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.