Literature DB >> 11415951

Influence of parity and lactation on hip fracture risk.

K Michaëlsson1, J A Baron, B Y Farahmand, S Ljunghall.   

Abstract

Several studies indicate that parity and lactation are associated with modest, short-term bone loss, but the long-term effect on osteoporotic fracture risk is uncertain. The authors therefore analyzed data from a population-based case-control study among Swedish postmenopausal women aged 50-81 years between October 1993 and February 1995. Mailed questionnaires and telephone interviews were used to collect data on 1,328 incident cases with hip fracture and 3,312 randomly selected controls. In age-adjusted analyses, the risk of hip fracture among all women was reduced by 10% per child (95% confidence interval (CI): 5, 14). After multivariate adjustment including body mass index as a covariate, the risk reduction was 5% per child (95% CI: 0, 10). Oral contraceptive use modified the association of parity with hip fracture risk. Among never users of oral contraceptives, the risk of hip fracture was reduced by 8% per child (95% CI: 2, 13), whereas among ever users of oral contraceptives, the risk was in the opposite direction, with an increase in risk by 19% per child (95% CI: 0, 41). After parity was considered, there was no association of duration of lactation period with fracture risk. The authors conclude that parity is modestly associated with a reduced hip fracture risk among women who had not used oral contraceptives previously.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11415951     DOI: 10.1093/aje/153.12.1166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  22 in total

1.  Parity and risk of hip fracture in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  M Kauppi; M Heliövaara; O Impivaara; P Knekt; A Jula
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Vitamin D receptor genotype and risk of osteoporotic hip fracture in elderly women of Utah: an effect modified by parity.

Authors:  H Wengreen; D R Cutler; R Munger; M Willing
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  The physiological costs of reproduction in small mammals.

Authors:  John R Speakman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-01-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Hip fracture risk among community-dwelling elderly people in the United States: a prospective study of physical, cognitive, and socioeconomic indicators.

Authors:  Robin Taylor Wilson; Gary A Chase; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Robert B Wallace
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Parity and osteoporotic fracture risk in postmenopausal women: a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies.

Authors:  Q Wang; Q Huang; Y Zeng; J-J Liang; S-Y Liu; X Gu; J-A Liu
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Modifiable lifestyle factors associated with fragility hip fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sharri J Mortensen; Indeevar Beeram; Jonathon Florance; Kaveh Momenzadeh; Amin Mohamadi; Edward K Rodriguez; Arvind von Keudell; Ara Nazarian
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Determinants of incidence of osteoporotic fractures in the female Spanish population older than 50.

Authors:  M Naves; J B Díaz-López; C Gómez; A Rodríguez-Rebollar; Jorge B Cannata-Andía
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  A meta-analysis of breastfeeding and osteoporotic fracture risk in the females.

Authors:  X Duan; J Wang; X Jiang
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Effects of multiparity and prolonged breast-feeding on maternal bone mineral density: a community-based cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Janaka Lenora; Sarath Lekamwasam; Magnus K Karlsson
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 2.809

10.  Hip fracture incidence in relation to age, menopausal status, and age at menopause: prospective analysis.

Authors:  Emily Banks; Gillian K Reeves; Valerie Beral; Angela Balkwill; Bette Liu; Andrew Roddam
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.