Literature DB >> 11415919

Imaging of hydrogel episcleral buckle fragmentation as a late complication after retinal reattachment surgery.

J I Lane1, J G Randall, N G Campeau, P K Overland, C A McCannel, T A Matsko.   

Abstract

Hydrogel encircling bands were introduced in the early 1980s as a product that was superior to bands composed of silicone rubber or silicone sponge for the surgical treatment of retinal detachment. Late complications consisting of orbital swelling and diplopia requiring band removal began to be reported in the early 1990s. Pathologic studies of these expanded fragments of hydrogel material after removal showed in vivo hydrolysis with foreign body reaction and dystrophic calcification. We report the imaging findings in five patients in whom this late complication developed. Hydrogel fragmentation has a characteristic imaging appearance consisting of a circumferential orbital mass associated with rim enhancement. This appearance should prompt inquiries regarding previous scleral buckle procedures with hydrogel bands. Familiarity with this appearance will avoid misinterpretation and unwarranted biopsy before band removal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11415919      PMCID: PMC7974789     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  13 in total

1.  [Progressive deterioration of episcleral Miragel explants].

Authors:  A C Gribomont
Journal:  Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol       Date:  1999

2.  Long-term complications of the MAI hydrogel intrascleral buckling implant.

Authors:  J F Marin; F I Tolentino; M F Refojo; C L Schepens
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1992-01

3.  Optimal imaging protocol after intraocular silicone oil tamponade.

Authors:  R C Herrick; L A Hayman; R K Maturi; P J Diaz-Marchan; R A Tang; H M Lambert
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Hydrogel exoplant fragmentation 10 years after scleral buckling surgery.

Authors:  K I Hwang; J I Lim
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-09

5.  Silicone sponge rejection. Early and late complications in retinal detachment surgery.

Authors:  C E Russo; R S Ruiz
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1971-06

6.  Erosion of implants in retinal detachment surgery.

Authors:  M O Yoshizumi; T Friberg
Journal:  Ann Ophthalmol       Date:  1983-05

7.  MR imaging and CT of surgical materials currently used in ophthalmology: in vitro and in vivo studies.

Authors:  C Girardot; V G Hazebroucq; E Fery-Lemonnier; L Tudoret; E Uzan; G Delmar; P Legmann; H Mondon; A Bonnin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  The MAI hydrophilic implant for scleral buckling: a review.

Authors:  P C Ho; I M Chan; M F Refojo; F I Tolentino
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg       Date:  1984-06

9.  Hydrogel implant for scleral buckling. Long-term observations.

Authors:  F I Tolentino; M Roldan; J Nassif; M F Refojo
Journal:  Retina       Date:  1985 Winter-Spring       Impact factor: 4.256

10.  Removal of scleral buckling elements. Causes and complications.

Authors:  P S Lindsey; L H Pierce; R B Welch
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1983-04
View more
  2 in total

1.  MIRAgel: the immunohistochemical expression of CD3, CD34, and CD68 in the surrounding capsule.

Authors:  M Roldan-Pallares; M LLanes-Estrada; F LLanes-Menendez
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Globe Loss From Intraocular Invasion of MIRAgel Scleral Buckle Components.

Authors:  Tal J Rubinstein; Maria M Choudhary; Yasha S Modi; Justis P Ehlers; Julian D Perry
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.746

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.