Literature DB >> 11415674

Preferred placement of the feet during quiet stance: development of a standardized foot placement for balance testing.

W E McIlroy1, B E Maki.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish a standardized stance position for balance testing based on average preferred foot placement, and to compare this to existing standards.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
BACKGROUND: It has been shown that the orientation of the feet can have a marked influence on the results obtained during balance testing, prompting the need for standardized foot positioning. Unfortunately, current recommendations do not appear to address concerns about the potential effects of 'uncomfortable' or 'unnatural' foot positions on the control of stabilizing reactions.
METHODS: The present study identifies the central tendency and variance of the preferred stance width and foot angle, measured from foot tracings in 262 subjects (89 male, 173 female) ranging in age from 19 to 97 years.
RESULTS: Results revealed a great degree of variability in preferred stance width and angle across subjects, although mean differences due to gender or age (</= 50 versus > 60) were small. The average preferred foot position was 0.17 m between heel centres, with an angle of 14 degrees between the long axes of the feet. Existing standards for stance position lie well outside the range of preferred foot placement.
CONCLUSIONS: The wide range of preferred foot placements clearly highlights the need for standardization during balance testing. A standard based on average preference would reduce potential effects of 'uncomfortable' or 'unnatural' foot positions, in comparison to existing standards. RELEVANCE: The development of a standardized stance position for balance testing is necessary since foot placement can influence stabilizing reactions. The present results provide a standardization based on average preferred foot placement, which will minimize between-subject variability and reduce the abnormal constraints that are placed on subjects by existing standards.

Year:  1997        PMID: 11415674     DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(96)00040-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  88 in total

1.  Impact of extremely low-frequency magnetic fields on human postural control.

Authors:  Sebastien Villard; Alicia Allen; Nicolas Bouisset; Michael Corbacio; Alex Thomas; Michel Guerraz; Alexandre Legros
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Training rapid stepping responses in an individual with stroke.

Authors:  Avril Mansfield; Elizabeth L Inness; Janice Komar; Louis Biasin; Karen Brunton; Bimal Lakhani; William E McIlroy
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2011-04-21

3.  Resolving conflicts in task demands during balance recovery: does holding an object inhibit compensatory grasping?

Authors:  Hamid Bateni; Aleksandra Zecevic; William E McIlroy; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Iliac crest orientation and geometry in able-bodied and non-treated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis girls with moderate and severe spinal deformity.

Authors:  Georgios A Stylianides; Marléne Beaulieu; Georges Dalleau; Charles-Hilaire Rivard; Paul Allard
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  The relationship between physiological arousal and cortical and autonomic responses to postural instability.

Authors:  Kathryn M Sibley; George Mochizuki; James S Frank; William E McIlroy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Influence of stance width on frontal plane postural dynamics and coordination in human balance control.

Authors:  Adam D Goodworth; Robert J Peterka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The use of peripheral vision to guide perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp balance-recovery reactions.

Authors:  Emily C King; Sandra M McKay; Kenneth C Cheng; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Clinical correlates of between-limb synchronization of standing balance control and falls during inpatient stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Avril Mansfield; George Mochizuki; Elizabeth L Inness; William E McIlroy
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.919

9.  The Effect of Ankle-Foot Orthoses on Balance Impairment: Single-Case Study.

Authors:  Noel Rao; Alexander Aruin
Journal:  J Prosthet Orthot       Date:  1999

10.  Differences in preferred reference frames for postural orientation shown by after-effects of stance on an inclined surface.

Authors:  Joann Kluzik; Fay B Horak; Robert J Peterka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.