Literature DB >> 11415594

Mechanical behaviour of hamstring muscles in low-back pain patients and control subjects.

F Tafazzoli1, M Lamontagne.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the passive elastic moment, the stiffness and the damping coefficient of the hip joint, as functions of the hip and knee joint angles in men with and without low-back pain. Two conventional tests, the straight-leg-raising test and the trunk forward flexion, were also performed and compared between these subjects. The passive elastic moment was measured using an isokinetic device in the passive mode. This device raised the lower limb from the horizontal position to the straight-leg-raising angle at a slow and constant angular velocity. A custom-made splint connected with the lever arm of the isokinetic device maintained the knee in extension and the ankle in the neutral position. The damping coefficient of the hip joint was measured for 0, 15, 45, 60, 75 and 90% of straight leg raising angle of each subject, using the suspension method based on small oscillation theory. To ensure that muscles were inactive during the passive hip moment tests, muscle activity was monitored with surface EMG. The stiffness was computed as the ratio of the change in passive elastic moment to the change in the hip angle. The passive elastic moment, the stiffness and the normalized trunk flexion were significantly different between the two groups respectively. There was, however, no difference between the two groups in the results of straight-leg-raise and damping coefficient of the hip. The passive elastic moment was a nonlinear function of the hip flexion angle and showed large intersubject differences, especially as the joint limit was approached. The damping coefficient was a polynomial function of the hip flexion angle. The measured variables were analysed using a discriminant function and it was shown that the two groups were clearly discriminable in a meaningful manner.

Entities:  

Year:  1996        PMID: 11415594     DOI: 10.1016/0268-0033(95)00038-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  6 in total

1.  Movement coordination of the lumbar spine and hip during a picking up activity in low back pain subjects.

Authors:  Gary L K Shum; Jack Crosbie; Raymond Y W Lee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-05-20       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  A Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Neurodynamic Sliders on Hamstring Responses in Footballers with Hamstring Tightness.

Authors:  Pattanasin Areeudomwong; Ketsarakon Oatyimprai; Saranchana Pathumb
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2016-12-07

3.  Dorsiflexion, plantar-flexion, and neutral ankle positions during passive resistance assessments of the posterior hip and thigh muscles.

Authors:  Ty B Palmer; Kazuma Akehi; Ryan M Thiele; Douglas B Smith; Aric J Warren; Brennan J Thompson
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  The effect of different neural mobilization exercises on hamstring flexibility and functional flexibility in wrestlers.

Authors:  Aydın Balcı; Ezgi Ünüvar; Bihter Akınoğlu; Tuğba Kocahan
Journal:  J Exerc Rehabil       Date:  2020-12-28

5.  Reliability of a New Indentometer Device for Measuring Myofascial Tissue Stiffness.

Authors:  Virginija Koch; Jan Wilke
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 4.964

6.  Lower hamstring extensibility in men compared to women is explained by differences in stretch tolerance.

Authors:  Paul W M Marshall; Jason C Siegler
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.