Literature DB >> 11415567

Flexible electrogoniometers: kinesiological advantages with respect to potentiometric goniometers.

L Tesio1, M Monzani, R Gatti, F Franchignoni.   

Abstract

Unlike conventional potentiometric goniometers, flexible electrogoniometers do not suffer from any alignment problems with respect to the joint axis. We hypothesized that flexible goniometers provide more valid measurements in that they avoid some biomechanical pitfalls. With both devices simultaneously we measured the movements of dorsal flexion of the ankle and flexion of the knee in three healthy subjects. In the various subjects, this comparison showed that the flexible goniometers signalled ankle excursion greater by 19-40% with the foot remaining in neutral position or being simultaneously pronated, and lower by 10-21% with the foot being simultaneously supinated. At the knee the flexible goniometers signalled a flexion greater by 24-32%, with respect to potentiometric goniometers. Biomechanical considerations support the validity of records taken with flexible goniometers, potentiometric measures being biased by (a) multijoint, multiplane motions underlying foot dorsal flexion, and (b) multiaxis motion underlying knee flexion RELEVANCE: In measurements of angles between adjacent body segments, flexible goniometers should be preferred to potentiometric goniometers despite their higher cost. Flexible goniometers not only are more practical: more importantly, they provide a valid measure of relative orientations in one plane, regardless of the number and different concurrent motions of the underlying joints.

Year:  1995        PMID: 11415567     DOI: 10.1016/0268-0033(95)00017-f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  5 in total

Review 1.  Working postures: a literature review.

Authors:  Edgar Ramos Vieira; Shrawan Kumar
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2004-06

Review 2.  A review of direct neck measurement in occupational settings.

Authors:  Letícia Carnaz; Mariana V Batistao; Helenice J C Gil Coury
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 3.  Robot-aided assessment of lower extremity functions: a review.

Authors:  Serena Maggioni; Alejandro Melendez-Calderon; Edwin van Asseldonk; Verena Klamroth-Marganska; Lars Lünenburger; Robert Riener; Herman van der Kooij
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 4.262

4.  A Mechanical Sensor Designed for Dynamic Joint Angle Measurement.

Authors:  Congo Tak-Shing Ching; Su-Yu Liao; Teng-Yun Cheng; Chih-Hsiu Cheng; Tai-Ping Sun; Yan-Dong Yao; Chin-Sung Hsiao; Kang-Ming Chang
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 2.682

Review 5.  Monitoring Methods of Human Body Joints: State-of-the-Art and Research Challenges.

Authors:  Abu Ilius Faisal; Sumit Majumder; Tapas Mondal; David Cowan; Sasan Naseh; M Jamal Deen
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.