Literature DB >> 11413954

[Effect of various suture strength factors on behavior of meniscus sutures in cyclic loading conditions].

R Seil1, S Rupp, C Jurecka, R Rein, D Kohn.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze meniscal sutures under cyclic loading conditions for different suture types (vertical and horizontal mattress sutures) and suture materials (absorbable monofilament sutures: PDS 2-0; PDS-0, and PDS-1 USP). Testing was performed on medial porcine menisci, using a well-established biomechanical testing model with a complete longitudinal tear 3 mm from the periphery of the meniscus. Sixty specimens were used. One suture was tested at a time. During cyclic testing 100 load cycles were applied with a crosshead speed of 50 mm/min. Three different maximum loads (10 N, 20 N, and 40 N) were used. The preload was set at 5 N. After cyclic loading, the specimens were loaded until failure. During cyclic loading, a gap appeared between the two parts of the meniscus, and partial tissue failures were observed at the surface of the meniscus. Gapping was more marked with higher loads and with the weaker suture material (p < 0.001). Using PDS 0 and PDS 1 sutures, less partial tissue failures were observed compared to PDS 2-0 (p < 0.001). The ultimate failure loads after cyclic loading were higher with PDS-0 and PDS-1 sutures. With these suture materials vertical sutures were stronger than horizontal sutures (p < 0.05). Using PDS 2-0 this difference could not be found. These results show that the primary strength of meniscal sutures depends on the suture material. The frequency and the amount of gapping and partial tissue failures, which can be observed under cyclic loading, are less distinct with PDS-0 and PDS-1 compared to PDS 2-0. From a biomechanical point of view, PDS 0 and PDS 1 sutures are recommended for meniscal sutures to guarantee a high primary stability, a small amount of gapping, and few partial tissue failures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11413954     DOI: 10.1007/s001130050748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  2 in total

1.  A new rigid biodegradable anchor for meniscus refixation: biomechanical evaluation.

Authors:  Thore Zantop; Anne Kathleen Eggers; Volker Musahl; Andre Weimann; Joachim Hassenpflug; Wolf Petersen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Increased Construct Stiffness With Meniscal Repair Sutures and Devices Increases the Risk of Cheese-Wiring During Biomechanical Load-to-Failure Testing.

Authors:  Sebastian Müller; Tanja Schwenk; Michael de Wild; Dimitris Dimitriou; Claudio Rosso
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-06-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.