Literature DB >> 11413813

[Experimental study of monopolar electrical and ultrasonic dissection].

R Antonutti1, I Fontes-Dislaire, J L Rumeau, D Mutter, G Fourtanier.   

Abstract

The aim of this experimental study was to compare the disadvantages of a monopolar electric scalpel and an ultrasonically-activated scalpel in a porcine model. Using thermal gradients, the ultrasonically-activated scalpel significantly decreased thermal energy dispersion to surrounding structures and thus decreased the risk of injuries to adjacent tissues and nerves, as opposed to the monopolar electric scalpel. Histological examination of nerves showed that necrosis was significantly less important with the use of the ultrasonically-activated scalpel. This experimental study demonstrated that the ultrasonically-activated scalpel caused less thermal and histological damage than the monopolar electric scalpel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11413813     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-3944(01)00515-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Chir        ISSN: 0003-3944


  3 in total

Review 1.  Dissection by ultrasonic energy versus monopolar electrosurgical energy in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Walid Sasi
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 2.172

2.  Ultrasonically activated scalpel versus monopolar electrocautery shovel in laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Bao-Jun Zhou; Wei-Qing Song; Qing-Hui Yan; Jian-Hui Cai; Feng-An Wang; Jin Liu; Guo-Jian Zhang; Guo-Qiang Duan; Zhan-Xue Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Contemporary use of ultrasonic versus standard electrosurgical dissection in laparoscopic nephrectomy: Safety, efficacy and cost.

Authors:  Nand Kishore Arvind; Qutubuddin Ali; Onkar Singh; Shilpi Gupta; Surbhi Sahay
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2018-07-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.