Literature DB >> 11413651

Induced pigmentation in zooplankton: a trade-off between threats from predation and ultraviolet radiation.

L A Hansson1.   

Abstract

Ultraviolet (UV) radiation is harmful to all life, and the ongoing depletion of the ozone layer is likely to affect interactions among both terrestrial and aquatic organisms. Some organisms have evolved adaptations to reduce radiation damage, such as the various types of protective pigmentation of freshwater zooplankton. However, strong pigmentation also increases vulnerability to visually hunting predators. Hence, where both UV radiation and predation are intense, zooplankton may be sandwiched between conflicting selective pressures: to be pigmented and to be transparent at the same time. Here, I show that the level of pigmentation in copepods is up to ten times higher in lakes without predatory fishes than where fishes are present. Moreover, animals from the same population exposed to either UV light or predator scent showed a 10% difference in pigmentation after only four days, suggesting that pigmentation is an inducible trait. Hence, individual copepods are not passive victims of selective predation or radiation damage, but adjust the level of pigmentation according to the prevailing threat. The ability to adjust pigmentation level rapidly may be especially useful in situations where risk assessment is difficult due to strong seasonal and spatial variation in risk variables, such as in Arctic regions. With progressive thinning of the ozone layer, the ability of some but not other organisms to adjust protection against UV radiation may lead to counter-intuitive, large-scale alterations in freshwater food webs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11413651      PMCID: PMC1690818          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  7 in total

Review 1.  Olfactory reception in invertebrates.

Authors:  J Krieger; H Breer
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-10-22       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses.

Authors:  C D Harvell
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.875

3.  Ecosystem response to solar ultraviolet-B radiation: influence of trophic-level interactions.

Authors:  M L Bothwell; D M Sherbot; C M Pollock
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-07-01       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Induced responses to herbivory and increased plant performance

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-02-20       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Increased amyloid precursor protein expression and serotonergic sprouting following excitotoxic lesion of the rat magnocellular nucleus basalis: neuroprotection by Ca(2+) antagonist nimodipine.

Authors:  T Harkany; I M Dijkstra; B J Oosterink; K M Horvath; I Abrahám; J Keijser; E A Van der Zee; P G Luiten
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 6.  The function of melanin or six blind people examine an elephant.

Authors:  H Z Hill
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.345

7.  Predator-induced phenotypical change in body morphology in crucian carp.

Authors:  C Brönmark; J G Miner
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-11-20       Impact factor: 47.728

  7 in total
  19 in total

1.  Environmental calcium modifies induced defences in snails.

Authors:  Simon D Rundle; John I Spicer; Ross A Coleman; Jo Vosper; Julie Soane
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Plankton reach new heights in effort to avoid predators.

Authors:  Brad J Gemmell; Houshuo Jiang; J Rudi Strickler; Edward J Buskey
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The biodiversity and ecology of Antarctic lakes: models for evolution.

Authors:  Johanna Laybourn-Parry; David A Pearce
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Imperfect transparency and camouflage in glass frogs.

Authors:  James B Barnett; Constantine Michalis; Hannah M Anderson; Brendan L McEwen; Justin Yeager; Jonathan N Pruitt; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Reciprocity in predator-prey interactions: exposure to defended prey and predation risk affects intermediate predator life history and morphology.

Authors:  Edd Hammill; Andrew P Beckerman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-11-21       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Hang on or run? Copepod mating versus predation risk in contrasting environments.

Authors:  Christian D Jersabek; Martin S Luger; Robert Schabetsberger; Susanne Grill; J Rudi Strickler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-06-02       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  UV radiation and freshwater zooplankton: damage, protection and recovery.

Authors:  Milla Rautio; Barbara Tartarotti
Journal:  Freshw Rev       Date:  2010-12

8.  Rapid enzymatic response to compensate UV radiation in copepods.

Authors:  María Sol Souza; Lars-Anders Hansson; Samuel Hylander; Beatriz Modenutti; Esteban Balseiro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Trade-offs between predation risk and growth benefits in the copepod Eurytemora affinis with contrasting pigmentation.

Authors:  Elena Gorokhova; Maiju Lehtiniemi; Nisha H Motwani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Size-structured risk assessments govern Daphnia migration.

Authors:  Lars-Anders Hansson; Samuel Hylander
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.