BACKGROUND: Notch signaling regulates multiple differentiation processes and cell fate decisions during both invertebrate and vertebrate development. Numb encodes an intracellular protein that was shown in Drosophila to antagonize Notch signaling at binary cell fate decisions of certain cell lineages. Although overexpression experiments suggested that Numb might also antagonize some Notch activity in vertebrates, the developmental processes in which Numb is involved remained elusive. RESULTS: We generated mice with a homozygous inactivation of Numb. These mice died before embryonic day E11.5, probably because of defects in angiogenic remodeling and placental dysfunction. Mutant embryos had an open anterior neural tube and impaired neuronal differentiation within the developing cranial central nervous system (CNS). In the developing spinal cord, the number of differentiated motoneurons was reduced. Within the peripheral nervous system (PNS), ganglia of cranial sensory neurons were formed. Trunk neural crest cells migrated and differentiated into sympathetic neurons. In contrast, a selective differentiation anomaly was observed in dorsal root ganglia, where neural crest--derived progenitor cells had migrated normally to form ganglionic structures, but failed to differentiate into sensory neurons. CONCLUSIONS: Mouse Numb is involved in multiple developmental processes and required for cell fate tuning in a variety of lineages. In the nervous system, Numb is required for the generation of a large subset of neuronal lineages. The restricted requirement of Numb during neural development in the mouse suggests that in some neuronal lineages, Notch signaling may be regulated independently of Numb.
BACKGROUND: Notch signaling regulates multiple differentiation processes and cell fate decisions during both invertebrate and vertebrate development. Numb encodes an intracellular protein that was shown in Drosophila to antagonize Notch signaling at binary cell fate decisions of certain cell lineages. Although overexpression experiments suggested that Numb might also antagonize some Notch activity in vertebrates, the developmental processes in which Numb is involved remained elusive. RESULTS: We generated mice with a homozygous inactivation of Numb. These mice died before embryonic day E11.5, probably because of defects in angiogenic remodeling and placental dysfunction. Mutant embryos had an open anterior neural tube and impaired neuronal differentiation within the developing cranial central nervous system (CNS). In the developing spinal cord, the number of differentiated motoneurons was reduced. Within the peripheral nervous system (PNS), ganglia of cranial sensory neurons were formed. Trunk neural crest cells migrated and differentiated into sympathetic neurons. In contrast, a selective differentiation anomaly was observed in dorsal root ganglia, where neural crest--derived progenitor cells had migrated normally to form ganglionic structures, but failed to differentiate into sensory neurons. CONCLUSIONS:MouseNumb is involved in multiple developmental processes and required for cell fate tuning in a variety of lineages. In the nervous system, Numb is required for the generation of a large subset of neuronal lineages. The restricted requirement of Numb during neural development in the mouse suggests that in some neuronal lineages, Notch signaling may be regulated independently of Numb.
Authors: Jing Nie; Melanie A McGill; Matt Dermer; Sascha E Dho; Cheryl D Wolting; C Jane McGlade Journal: EMBO J Date: 2002-01-15 Impact factor: 11.598
Authors: Mary Redmond Hutson; Xiaopei Lily Zeng; Andrew J Kim; Emily Antoon; Stephen Harward; Margaret L Kirby Journal: Development Date: 2010-08-11 Impact factor: 6.868
Authors: Mingfu Wu; Christopher L Smith; James A Hall; Ivy Lee; Kate Luby-Phelps; Michelle D Tallquist Journal: Dev Cell Date: 2010-07-20 Impact factor: 12.270
Authors: Christian A Smith; Kimberly M Lau; Zohra Rahmani; Sascha E Dho; Greg Brothers; Ye Min She; Donna M Berry; Eric Bonneil; Pierre Thibault; François Schweisguth; Roland Le Borgne; C Jane McGlade Journal: EMBO J Date: 2007-01-04 Impact factor: 11.598
Authors: Rajani M George; Stefano Biressi; Brian J Beres; Erik Rogers; Amanda K Mulia; Ronald E Allen; Alan Rawls; Thomas A Rando; Jeanne Wilson-Rawls Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-10-29 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Eric J Huang; Huashun Li; Amy A Tang; Amanda K Wiggins; Rachael L Neve; Weimin Zhong; Lily Y Jan; Yuh Nung Jan Journal: Genes Dev Date: 2004-12-14 Impact factor: 11.361