Literature DB >> 11412314

Comparison of methods for determining the numbers and species distribution of coliform bacteria in well water samples.

R M Niemi1, M P Heikkilä, K Lahti, S Kalso, S I Niemelä.   

Abstract

AIMS: Enumeration of coliform bacteria and Escherichia coli is the most widely used method in the estimation of hygienic quality of drinking water. The yield of target bacteria and the species composition of different populations of coliform bacteria may depend on the method.Three methods were compared. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Three membrane filtration methods were used for the enumeration of coliform bacteria in shallow well waters. The yield of confirmed coliform bacteria was highest on Differential Coliform agar, followed by LES Endo agar. Differential Coliform agar had the highest proportion of typical colonies, of which 74% were confirmed as belonging to the Enterobacteriaceae. Of the typical colonies on Lactose Tergitol 7 TTC agar, 75% were confirmed as Enterobacteriaceae, whereas 92% of typical colonies on LES Endo agar belonged to the Enterobacteriaceae. LES Endo agar yielded many Serratia strains, Lactose Tergitol 7 TTC agar yielded numerous strains of Rahnella aquatilis and Enterobacter, whereas Differential Coliform agar yielded the widest range of species.
CONCLUSION: The yield of coliform bacteria varied between methods. Each method compared had a characteristic species distribution of target bacteria and a typical level of interference of non-target bacteria. Identification with routine physiological tests to distinct species was hampered by the slight differences between species. High yield and sufficient selectivity are difficult to achieve simultaneously, especially if the target group is diverse. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The results showed that several aspects of method performance should be considered, and that the target group must be distinctly defined to enable method comparisons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11412314     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01314.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 1364-5072            Impact factor:   3.772


  5 in total

1.  Culturable bacterial microbiota of Plagiodera versicolora (L.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and virulence of the isolated strains.

Authors:  Meryem Demirci; Elif Sevim; İsmail Demir; Ali Sevim
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 2.099

2.  Bacterial DNA Detected in Japanese Rice Wines and the Fermentation Starters.

Authors:  Momoka Terasaki; Akari Fukuyama; Yurika Takahashi; Masato Yamada; Hiromi Nishida
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  A comparison of bacterial indicators and methods in rural surface waters.

Authors:  Robin W Kloot; Bobby Radakovich; Xiaoqing Huang; Daniel Duke Brantley
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Frequency and diversity of small cryptic plasmids in the genus Rahnella.

Authors:  Wilfried Rozhon; Elena Petutschnig; Mamoona Khan; David K Summers; Brigitte Poppenberger
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 3.605

5.  Evaluating DNA Extraction Methods for Community Profiling of Pig Hindgut Microbial Community.

Authors:  Yang Lu; Philip Hugenholtz; Damien John Batstone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.