Literature DB >> 11410153

Ejaculate allocation by male sand martins, Riparia riparia.

E H Nicholls1, T Burke, T R Birkhead.   

Abstract

Males of many species allocate sperm to ejaculates strategically in response to variation in the risk and intensity of sperm competition. The notable exception is passerine birds, in which evidence for strategic allocation is absent. Here we report the results of a study testing for strategic ejaculate allocation in a passerine bird, the sand martin (Riparia riparia). Natural ejaculates were collected from males copulating with a model female. Ejaculates transferred in the presence of a rival male contained significantly more sperm than ejaculates transferred in the absence of a rival male. There was no evidence that this difference was due to the confounding effects of the year of ejaculate collection, the identity of the model female, the colony, the stage of season or the period of the day in which ejaculates were collected. A more detailed examination of the ejaculate patterns of individual males, achieved by the DNA profiling of ejaculates, provided additional evidence for strategic allocation of sperm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11410153      PMCID: PMC1088736          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  4 in total

1.  No evidence for sperm priming responses under varying sperm competition risk or intensity in guppies.

Authors:  Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2009-03-24

2.  Ejaculate economics: an experimental test in a moth.

Authors:  Jin Xu; Qiao Wang
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Male mate choice, sexual conflict and strategic allocation of copulations in a lekking bird.

Authors:  S A Saether; P Fiske; J A Kålås
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Individual adjustment of sperm expenditure accords with sperm competition theory.

Authors:  Andrea Pilastro; Marta Scaggiante; Maria B Rasotto
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.