Literature DB >> 11409798

Accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with T2 and T3 breast cancers.

S L Wong1, C Chao, M J Edwards, T M Tuttle, R D Noyes, D J Carlson, A L Laidley, T Q McGlothin, P B Ley, C M Brown, R L Glaser, R E Pennington, P S Turk, D Simpson, K M McMasters.   

Abstract

Although numerous studies have demonstrated that sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy can accurately determine the axillary nodal status for early breast cancer some studies have suggested that SLN biopsy may be less reliable for tumors >2 cm in size. This analysis was performed to determine whether tumor size affects the accuracy of SLN biopsy. The University of Louisville Breast Cancer Sentinel Lymph Node Study is a prospective multi-institutional study involving 226 surgeons. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of each institution, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. Patients with clinical stage T1-2 N0 breast cancer were eligible for the study. Some patients with T3 tumors were included because they were clinically staged as T2 but on final pathology were found to have tumors >5 cm. This analysis includes 2148 patients who were enrolled from August 1997 through October 2000. All patients underwent SLN biopsy using a combination of radioactive colloid and blue dye injection followed by completion Level I/II axillary dissection. Statistical comparison was performed by chi-square analysis. The SLN identification rate, false negative rate, and overall accuracy of SLN biopsy were not significantly different among tumor stages T1, T2, and T3. We conclude that SLN biopsy is no less accurate for T2-3 breast cancers compared with T1 tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11409798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  7 in total

1.  [Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer].

Authors:  A Rody; C Solbach; M Kaufmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Clinicopathologic factors associated with false-negative sentinel lymph-node biopsy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Hiram S Cody
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Impact of patient- and disease-specific factors on SLNB in breast cancer patients. Are current guidelines justified?

Authors:  A Bembenek; J Fischer; H Albrecht; E Kemnitz; S Gretschel; U Schneider; S Dresel; P M Schlag
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Identification of metastatic nodal disease in a phase 1 dose-escalation trial of intraoperative sentinel lymph node mapping in non-small cell lung cancer using near-infrared imaging.

Authors:  Denis M Gilmore; Onkar V Khullar; Michael T Jaklitsch; Lucian R Chirieac; John V Frangioni; Yolonda L Colson
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Clinicopathologic factors associated with false-negative sentinel lymph-node biopsy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Robert C G Martin; Anees Chagpar; Charles R Scoggins; Michael J Edwards; Lee Hagendoorn; Arnold J Stromberg; Kelly M McMasters
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  A Comparative Validation of Primary Surgical Versus Post-neo-adjuvant Chemotherapy Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Stage III Breast Cancers.

Authors:  Gaurav Agarwal; Sendhil Rajan; Sanjay Gambhir; Punita Lal; Narendra Krishnani; Subhash Kheruka
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  Contraindications of sentinel lymph node biopsy: are there any really?

Authors:  George M Filippakis; George Zografos
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-01-29       Impact factor: 2.754

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.