Literature DB >> 11409787

Characteristics of the audiometric notch as a clinical sign of noise exposure.

D McBride1, S Williams.   

Abstract

This study investigated variability in audiometric notch recognition by asking three clinicians to identify notches in the audiograms of 634 noise-exposed employees. Agreement between the raters was assessed, and three notch characteristics, frequency, depth and shape (a wide or narrow notch), were investigated as recognition factors. The proportions of positive tests reported by each rater were 0.26, 0.49 and 0.68, respectively. The 'all rater' index of agreement was 0.45, and the range for pairwise comparisons was 0.14 to 0.52. With recognition factors, rater 1 was most strongly influenced by depth, rater 2 by shape and rater 3 by a possible combination of criteria. To reduce variability we suggest that narrow notches should be at least 15 dB in depth, and that broad notches should have a depth of 20 dB, with a recovery of at least 10 dB at the high end. Care should also be taken to elicit a sufficient history of noise exposure, and ensure that there are no other explanations for the notch.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11409787     DOI: 10.1080/010503901300112211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand Audiol        ISSN: 0105-0397


  10 in total

1.  A Novel Method for Classifying Hearing Impairment in Epidemiological Studies of Aging: The Wisconsin Age-Related Hearing Impairment Classification Scale.

Authors:  Karen J Cruickshanks; David M Nondahl; Mary E Fischer; Carla R Schubert; Ted S Tweed
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 1.493

2.  Notched audiograms and noise exposure history in older adults.

Authors:  David M Nondahl; Xiaoyu Shi; Karen J Cruickshanks; Dayna S Dalton; Ted S Tweed; Terry L Wiley; Lakeesha L Carmichael
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 3.  Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity and ototoxicity: new paradigms for translational genomics.

Authors:  Lois B Travis; Sophie D Fossa; Howard D Sesso; Robert D Frisina; David N Herrmann; Clair J Beard; Darren R Feldman; Lance C Pagliaro; Robert C Miller; David J Vaughn; Lawrence H Einhorn; Nancy J Cox; M Eileen Dolan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Hearing status among Norwegian train drivers and train conductors.

Authors:  A Lie; M Skogstad; T S Johnsen; B Engdahl; K Tambs
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 1.611

5.  A cross-sectional study of hearing thresholds among 4627 Norwegian train and track maintenance workers.

Authors:  Arve Lie; Marit Skogstad; Torstein Seip Johnsen; Bo Engdahl; Kristian Tambs
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Predictive factors of occupational noise-induced hearing loss in Spanish workers: A prospective study.

Authors:  Armando Carballo Pelegrin; Leonides Canuet; Ángeles Arias Rodríguez; Maria Pilar Arévalo Morales
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.867

7.  Effects of noise exposure on young adults with normal audiograms I: Electrophysiology.

Authors:  Garreth Prendergast; Hannah Guest; Kevin J Munro; Karolina Kluk; Agnès Léger; Deborah A Hall; Michael G Heinz; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Effects of noise exposure on young adults with normal audiograms II: Behavioral measures.

Authors:  Garreth Prendergast; Rebecca E Millman; Hannah Guest; Kevin J Munro; Karolina Kluk; Rebecca S Dewey; Deborah A Hall; Michael G Heinz; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Assessment of Noise Exposure and Hearing Loss Among Workers in Textile Mill (Thamine), Myanmar: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Aung K Zaw; Aung M Myat; Mya Thandar; Ye M Htun; Than H Aung; Kyaw M Tun; Zaw M Han
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2020-04-23

10.  The association between subcortical and cortical fMRI and lifetime noise exposure in listeners with normal hearing thresholds.

Authors:  Rebecca S Dewey; Susan T Francis; Hannah Guest; Garreth Prendergast; Rebecca E Millman; Christopher J Plack; Deborah A Hall
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 6.556

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.