SETTING: Stellenbosch University, a tertiary care hospital in Cape Town, South Africa. OBJECTIVE: To determine the early bactericidal activity (EBA) of amikacin in dosages of 5 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg and 15 mg/kg body weight in comparison to that of isoniazid 6 mg/kg body weight or no drug. DESIGN: An open, randomised trial. PATIENTS: Patients with previously untreated, sputum smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis. INTERVENTION: Patients received amikacin 5 mg/kg (12 patients), 10 mg/kg (13 patients) or 15 mg/kg (15 patients), isoniazid 6 mg/kg (9 patients) or no drug (10 patients). RESULTS: The rate of decrease in log viable colony forming units of Mycobacterium tuberculosis per ml of sputum per day during the first 2 days of treatment with amikacin 5 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg and 15 mg/kg was 0.041 (SD 0.100), 0.045 (SD 0.144) and 0.052 (SD 0.096), respectively, 0.515 (SD 0.173) in the patients receiving isoniazid 6 mg/kg, and 0.041 (SD 0.113) in those receiving no drug. The EBA found in patients receiving amikacin did not differ significantly from that of the no drug group. However, as the EBA in the no drug group was the highest ever encountered at Stellenbosch University, the mean in patients receiving drug was tested against 0 and found to differ significantly (P = 0.03), suggesting minimal activity. Mean amikacin serum concentrations 1 hour after intramuscular drug administration were 13.5 microg/ml, 26.7 microg/ml and 39.2 microg/ml in the patients receiving 5 mg, 10 mg and 15 mg per kg body weight, respectively. CONCLUSION: Despite serum concentrations well in excess of the minimal inhibitory concentration of 2-4 microg/ml, the EBA of amikacin in patients with smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis was only just detectable.
RCT Entities:
SETTING: Stellenbosch University, a tertiary care hospital in Cape Town, South Africa. OBJECTIVE: To determine the early bactericidal activity (EBA) of amikacin in dosages of 5 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg and 15 mg/kg body weight in comparison to that of isoniazid 6 mg/kg body weight or no drug. DESIGN: An open, randomised trial. PATIENTS: Patients with previously untreated, sputum smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis. INTERVENTION: Patients received amikacin 5 mg/kg (12 patients), 10 mg/kg (13 patients) or 15 mg/kg (15 patients), isoniazid 6 mg/kg (9 patients) or no drug (10 patients). RESULTS: The rate of decrease in log viable colony forming units of Mycobacterium tuberculosis per ml of sputum per day during the first 2 days of treatment with amikacin 5 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg and 15 mg/kg was 0.041 (SD 0.100), 0.045 (SD 0.144) and 0.052 (SD 0.096), respectively, 0.515 (SD 0.173) in the patients receiving isoniazid 6 mg/kg, and 0.041 (SD 0.113) in those receiving no drug. The EBA found in patients receiving amikacin did not differ significantly from that of the no drug group. However, as the EBA in the no drug group was the highest ever encountered at Stellenbosch University, the mean in patients receiving drug was tested against 0 and found to differ significantly (P = 0.03), suggesting minimal activity. Mean amikacin serum concentrations 1 hour after intramuscular drug administration were 13.5 microg/ml, 26.7 microg/ml and 39.2 microg/ml in the patients receiving 5 mg, 10 mg and 15 mg per kg body weight, respectively. CONCLUSION: Despite serum concentrations well in excess of the minimal inhibitory concentration of 2-4 microg/ml, the EBA of amikacin in patients with smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis was only just detectable.
Authors: Kelly E Dooley; Carole D Mitnick; Mary Ann DeGroote; Ekwaro Obuku; Vera Belitsky; Carol D Hamilton; Mamodikoe Makhene; Sarita Shah; James C M Brust; Nadza Durakovic; Eric Nuermberger Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2012-05-21 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: R van Altena; J A Dijkstra; M E van der Meer; J F Borjas Howard; J G W Kosterink; D van Soolingen; T S van der Werf; J W C Alffenaar Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2017-02-23 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Veronique De Jager; Lize van der Merwe; Amour Venter; Peter R Donald; Andreas H Diacon Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2017-03-24 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Irma A J M Bakker-Woudenberg; Wim van Vianen; Dick van Soolingen; Henri A Verbrugh; Michiel A van Agtmael Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Ashwin S Dharmadhikari; Mohan Kabadi; Bob Gerety; Anthony J Hickey; P Bernard Fourie; Edward Nardell Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2013-03-25 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Louis Grandjean; Laura Martin; Robert H Gilman; Teresa Valencia; Beatriz Herrera; Willi Quino; Eric Ramos; Maribel Rivero; Rosario Montoya; A Roderick Escombe; David Coleman; Denis Mitchison; Carlton A Evans Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2008-04-30 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Ethel D Weld; Anthony J Garcia-Prats; Jennifer J Furin; Theodore C Bailey; Anneke C Hesseling; Kelly E Dooley Journal: Lancet Respir Med Date: 2017-03-15 Impact factor: 102.642
Authors: Christoph Lange; Ibrahim Abubakar; Jan-Willem C Alffenaar; Graham Bothamley; Jose A Caminero; Anna Cristina C Carvalho; Kwok-Chiu Chang; Luigi Codecasa; Ana Correia; Valeriu Crudu; Peter Davies; Martin Dedicoat; Francis Drobniewski; Raquel Duarte; Cordula Ehlers; Connie Erkens; Delia Goletti; Gunar Günther; Elmira Ibraim; Beate Kampmann; Liga Kuksa; Wiel de Lange; Frank van Leth; Jan van Lunzen; Alberto Matteelli; Dick Menzies; Ignacio Monedero; Elvira Richter; Sabine Rüsch-Gerdes; Andreas Sandgren; Anna Scardigli; Alena Skrahina; Enrico Tortoli; Grigory Volchenkov; Dirk Wagner; Marieke J van der Werf; Bhanu Williams; Wing-Wai Yew; Jean-Pierre Zellweger; Daniela Maria Cirillo Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2014-03-23 Impact factor: 16.671