Literature DB >> 11409022

Comparison of three methods in surgical treatment of pilonidal disease.

H Aydede1, Y Erhan, A Sakarya, Y Kumkumoglu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The present study was designed to compare three methods that are still used for the surgical treatment of pilonidal disease: marsupialization, primary midline closure and skin flaps.
METHODS: One hundred and one out of a total of 203 pilonidal disease patients underwent excision and marsupialization, while 82 patients had excision and primary closure and the remaining 20 were treated with excision and skin flaps. The minimum and maximum follow-up periods for the aforementioned surgical methods were 4 and 5 years, respectively. All patients were reviewed for in-hospital stay, return to work, wound infection and recurrence rates. Student's t-test and Fisher's exact test were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: Average hospital stays for marsupialization, primary closure and skin flaps were 2.84 +/- 0.13, 2.62 +/- 0.12 and 5.95 +/- 0.52 days, respectively. Hospital stay for the skin flaps method was longer than that for the other two methods. The average time to return to work after marsupialization was 5.42 +/- 0.08 weeks; but the time needed to return to work after undergoing the primary closure or the skin flaps methods was much shorter: 2.15 +/- 0.05 and 2.90 +/- 0.20 weeks, respectively (P < 0.001). There was no difference in wound infection rate (P = 1.000) or recurrence rates.
CONCLUSION: The fact that there were no differences in terms of wound infection or recurrence rates between the three groups, and the relatively shorter period for returning to work, emphasize the usefulness of the excision and repair techniques in the surgical treatment of pilonidal disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11409022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  18 in total

1.  Primary wound closure with a Limberg flap vs. secondary wound healing after excision of a pilonidal sinus: a multicentre randomised controlled study.

Authors:  S A Käser; R Zengaffinen; M Uhlmann; C Glaser; C A Maurer
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Radiofrequency sinus excision: better alternative to marsupialization technique in sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease.

Authors:  Pravin J Gupta
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 3.  German national guideline on the management of pilonidal disease.

Authors:  I Iesalnieks; A Ommer; S Petersen; D Doll; A Herold
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Comparison of Karydakis versus midline excision for treatment of pilonidal sinus disease.

Authors:  Peter Morden; Robert A Drongowski; James D Geiger; Ronald B Hirschl; Daniel H Teitelbaum
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2005-10-21       Impact factor: 1.827

5.  Crystallized phenol treatment of pilonidal disease improves quality of life.

Authors:  Omer Topuz; Selim Sözen; Mustafa Tükenmez; Sezgin Topuz; Umit Erkan Vurdem
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 0.656

6.  What is the role of mechanical bowel preparation in patients with pilonidal sinus undergoing surgery? Prospective, randomized, surgeon-blinded trial.

Authors:  Cem Terzi; Aras Emre Canda; Tarkan Unek; Esra Dalgic; Mehmet Fuzun
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Elliptical excision with midline primary closure versus rhomboid excision with limberg flap reconstruction in sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Tufale A Dass; Muneer Zaz; Ajaz Rather; Shamsul Bari
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2012-01-07       Impact factor: 0.656

8.  Sinotomy technique versus surgical excision with primary closure technique in pilonidal sinus disease.

Authors:  Seyfi Emir; Omer Topuz; Burhan Hakan Kanat; Ilhan Bali
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.363

9.  A prospective randomised study comparing two treatment modalities for chronic pilonidal sinus with a 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Milind M Rao; Wojtek Zawislak; Raymond Kennedy; Robert Gilliland
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  A novel approach for treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: less is more.

Authors:  Christopher Soll; Dieter Hahnloser; Daniel Dindo; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Franc Hetzer
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.