Literature DB >> 11408848

Does cervical cerclage prevent preterm delivery in patients with a short cervix?

S S Hassan1, R Romero, E Maymon, S M Berry, S C Blackwell, M C Treadwell, M Tomlinson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine whether cerclage placement in women with a short cervix on transvaginal ultrasonography reduces the rate of preterm delivery. STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study identified patients with an ultrasonographic short cervix (cervical length < or =15 mm) between 14 and 24 weeks' gestation. Cerclage placement was performed at the discretion of the attending physician. Clinical characteristics and outcome with and without cerclage were compared.
RESULTS: Seventy patients met inclusion criteria; 25 (36%) underwent cerclage placement. Patients managed with cerclage had a lower gestational age at diagnosis (19.6 weeks vs 21.3 weeks, P <.01) but had a similar median cervical length, presence of funneling, and a history of cervical surgery, in comparison with those managed without cerclage. The rate of spontaneous preterm delivery was not different between groups. Patients with cerclage had a higher rate of preterm premature rupture of membranes than those without cerclage (65.2% vs 36.4%, P <.05).
CONCLUSION: Cervical cerclage in patients with a short cervix did not reduce the rate of spontaneous preterm delivery and increased the risk of preterm premature rupture of membranes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11408848     DOI: 10.1067/mob.2001.115119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  13 in total

1.  Patients with an asymptomatic short cervix (<or=15 mm) have a high rate of subclinical intraamniotic inflammation: implications for patient counseling.

Authors:  Edi Vaisbuch; Sonia S Hassan; Shali Mazaki-Tovi; Chia-Ling Nhan-Chang; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Zhong Dong; Lami Yeo; Pooja Mittal; Bo Hyun Yoon; Roberto Romero
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Can the optimal cervical length for placing ultrasound-indicated cerclage be identified?

Authors:  J M Szychowski; J Owen; G Hankins; J D Iams; J S Sheffield; A Perez-Delboy; V Berghella; D A Wing; E R Guzman
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-05-29       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 3.  Vaginal progesterone in women with an asymptomatic sonographic short cervix in the midtrimester decreases preterm delivery and neonatal morbidity: a systematic review and metaanalysis of individual patient data.

Authors:  Roberto Romero; Kypros Nicolaides; Agustin Conde-Agudelo; Ann Tabor; John M O'Brien; Elcin Cetingoz; Eduardo Da Fonseca; George W Creasy; Katharina Klein; Line Rode; Priya Soma-Pillay; Shalini Fusey; Cetin Cam; Zarko Alfirevic; Sonia S Hassan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-12-11       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 4.  The role of cervical cerclage in obstetric practice: can the patient who could benefit from this procedure be identified?

Authors:  Roberto Romero; Jimmy Espinoza; Offer Erez; Sonia Hassan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 5.  Recurrent preterm birth.

Authors:  Shali Mazaki-Tovi; Roberto Romero; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Offer Erez; Beth L Pineles; Francesca Gotsch; Pooja Mittal; Nandor Gabor Than; Jimmy Espinoza; Sonia S Hassan
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.300

Review 6.  Is sonographic assessment of the cervix necessary and helpful?

Authors:  Joel D Larma; Jay D Iams
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.190

7.  The risk of impending preterm delivery in asymptomatic patients with a nonmeasurable cervical length in the second trimester.

Authors:  Edi Vaisbuch; Roberto Romero; Shali Mazaki-Tovi; Offer Erez; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Pooja Mittal; Francesca Gotsch; Clara Ward; Vivian Romero; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Percy Pacora; Lami Yeo; Sonia S Hassan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-07-24       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 8.  Vaginal progesterone vs. cervical cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix, previous preterm birth, and singleton gestation: a systematic review and indirect comparison metaanalysis.

Authors:  Agustin Conde-Agudelo; Roberto Romero; Kypros Nicolaides; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; John M O'Brien; Elcin Cetingoz; Eduardo da Fonseca; George Creasy; Priya Soma-Pillay; Shalini Fusey; Cetin Cam; Zarko Alfirevic; Sonia S Hassan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Multicenter randomized trial of cerclage for preterm birth prevention in high-risk women with shortened midtrimester cervical length.

Authors:  John Owen; Gary Hankins; Jay D Iams; Vincenzo Berghella; Jeanne S Sheffield; Annette Perez-Delboy; Robert S Egerman; Deborah A Wing; Mark Tomlinson; Richard Silver; Susan M Ramin; Edwin R Guzman; Michael Gordon; Helen Y How; Eric J Knudtson; Jeff M Szychowski; Suzanne Cliver; John C Hauth
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Analysis of maternal and neonatal outcomes using cervical cerclage or conservative treatment in singleton gestations with a sonographic short cervix.

Authors:  Xiaoxiu Huang; Ruizhe Chen; Baohua Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.