Literature DB >> 11408436

Effect of REM sleep on retroglossal cross-sectional area and compliance in normal subjects.

J A Rowley1, C S Sanders, B R Zahn, M S Badr.   

Abstract

It has been proposed that the upper airway compliance should be highest during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. Evidence suggests that the increased compliance is secondary to an increased retroglossal compliance. To test this hypothesis, we examined the effect of sleep stage on the relationship of retroglossal cross-sectional area (CSA; visualized with a fiber-optic scope) to pharyngeal pressure measured at the level of the oropharynx during eupneic breathing in subjects without significant sleep-disordered breathing. Breaths during REM sleep were divided into phasic (associated with eye movement, PREM) and tonic (not associated with eye movements, TREM). Retroglossal CSA decreased with non-REM (NREM) sleep and decreased further in PREM [wake 156.8 +/- 48.6 mm(2), NREM 104.6 +/- 65.0 mm(2) (P < 0.05 wake vs. NREM), TREM 83.1 +/- 46.4 mm(2) (P = not significant NREM vs. TREM), PREM 73.9 + 39.2 mm(2) (P < 0.05 TREM vs. PREM)]. Retroglossal compliance, defined as the slope of the regression CSA vs. pharyngeal pressure, was the same between all four conditions (wake -0.7 + 2.1 mm(2)/cmH(2)O, NREM 0.6 +/- 3.0 mm(2)/cmH(2)O, TREM -0.2 +/- 3.3 mm(2)/cmH(2)O, PREM -0.6 +/- 5.1 mm(2)/cmH(2)O, P = not significant). We conclude that the intrinsic properties of the airway wall determine retroglossal compliance independent of changes in the neuromuscular activity associated with changes in sleep state.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11408436     DOI: 10.1152/jappl.2001.91.1.239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  8 in total

1.  Retropalatal and retroglossal airway compliance in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Melania Marques; Pedro R Genta; Ali Azarbarzin; Scott A Sands; Luigi Taranto-Montemurro; Ludovico Messineo; David P White; Andrew Wellman
Journal:  Respir Physiol Neurobiol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 1.931

2.  Upper airway collapsibility during REM sleep in children with the obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.

Authors:  Jingtao Huang; Laurie R Karamessinis; Michelle E Pepe; Stephen M Glinka; John M Samuel; Paul R Gallagher; Carole L Marcus
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.849

3.  Healthy humans with a narrow upper airway maintain patency during quiet breathing by dilating the airway during inspiration.

Authors:  Shaokoon Cheng; Elizabeth C Brown; Alice Hatt; Jane E Butler; Simon C Gandevia; Lynne E Bilston
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Mathematical determination of inspiratory upper airway resistance using a polynomial equation.

Authors:  Khaled Mansour; M Safwan Badr; Mahdi A Shkoukani; James A Rowley
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.816

5.  The influence of obstructive sleep apnea and gender on genioglossus activity during rapid eye movement sleep.

Authors:  Danny J Eckert; Atul Malhotra; Yu L Lo; David P White; Amy S Jordan
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 6.  Mechanical properties of the upper airway.

Authors:  Kingman P Strohl; James P Butler; Atul Malhotra
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 9.090

7.  Role of sensory stimulation in amelioration of obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Mak Adam Daulatzai
Journal:  Sleep Disord       Date:  2011-04-05

8.  Dynamic Upper Airway Imaging during Wakefulness in Obese Subjects with and without Sleep Apnea.

Authors:  Yuan Feng; Brendan T Keenan; Stephen Wang; Sarah Leinwand; Andrew Wiemken; Allan I Pack; Richard J Schwab
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 30.528

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.