Literature DB >> 11407768

Skeletal changes of Herbst appliance therapy investigated with more conventional cephalometrics and European norms.

C Manfredi1, R Cimino, A Trani, H Pancherz.   

Abstract

We measured the skeletal effects of Herbst appliance treatment in a retrospective sample of 25 boys (aged 10.7-14.5 years) and 25 girls (aged 10.7-14.3 years). Selection criteria were (1) a pretreatment full Class II molar relationship (ANB angle: average, 6.7 degrees; range, 2.5-10.5 degrees) and (2) a posttreatment full Class I or overcorrected Class I molar relationship within 6-8 months. A first t-test was used to evaluate variations between pre- and posttreatment cephalometric measures. Then, compared with the appropriate age- and sex-matched European norm, every pre- and posttreatment value was transformed into a z-score on the distribution of the norm value and a second t-test was performed. The second t-test was to study variations between pre- and posttreatment z-scores in order to neutralize the effect of natural growth. Posttreatment, the mandible showed a remarkable forward repositioning without opening of the gonial angle, particularly in males. Only ANB and Xi-CF-PTV angles were significantly different when the effect of normal growth was excluded. In males, ramus height and mandibular basal length were significantly increased when total variation was considered (ie, not excluding the effect of normal growth). In females, only the mandibular ramus height was significantly increased. In conclusion, even short-term Herbst therapy can be efficacious, with the most frequent effect being mandibular forward repositioning followed by mandibular ramus elongation. The statistical procedure used counteracts the effect of growth and sex on the results. Moreover, z-scores are adimensional measures with which any kind of parameter may be compared and scaled to each other in the perspective of a more reliable mutivariated interpretation of cephalometric variables.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11407768     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2001)071<0170:SCOHAT>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  6 in total

1.  Reaction of facial soft tissues to treatment with a Herbst appliance.

Authors:  P Meyer-Marcotty; J Kochel; U Richter; F Richter; Angelika Stellzig-Eisenhauer
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Dental and skeletal changes in patients with mandibular retrognathism following treatment with Herbst and pre-adjusted fixed appliance.

Authors:  Fabio de Abreu Vigorito; Gladys Cristina Dominguez; Luís Antônio de Arruda Aidar
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb

3.  Three-dimensional treatment outcomes in Class II patients treated with the Herbst appliance: a pilot study.

Authors:  Megan LeCornu; Lucia H S Cevidanes; Hongtu Zhu; Chih-Da Wu; Brent Larson; Tung Nguyen
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Ultrasonographic Evaluation of The Effects of Orthodontic or Functional Orthopaedic Treatment on Masseter Muscles: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Romeo Patini; Patrizia Gallenzi; Roberta Lione; Paola Cozza; Massimo Cordaro
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 2.430

5.  Long-term dentoskeletal changes with the Bionator, Herbst, Twin Block, and MARA functional appliances.

Authors:  Nicole J Siara-Olds; Valmy Pangrazio-Kulbersh; Jeff Berger; Burcu Bayirli
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Establishing Cephalometric Norms using Sagittal and Vertical Occlusal Cephalometric Analysis of Pancherz for Dakshina Kannada Children.

Authors:  M Sahitya; E P Shashidhar; G C Chidanandeswara; Sharath Kumar B Shetty; Y Mahesh Kumar
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2015-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.