Literature DB >> 11407519

Sentinel lymph node detection for breast cancer: which patients are best suited for the patent blue dye only method of identification?

C Nos1, P Fréneaux, S Guilbert, M C Falcou, R J Salmon, K B Clough.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were, first, to define the preoperative criteria for using solely the blue dye method and, second, to decrease its operator dependence in predicting axillary lymph node status.
METHODS: Two hundred fifty-three women consecutively identified with operable breast cancer underwent sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection by the patent blue dye method followed by completion axillary lymph node dissection. A standard pathological examination was performed for all SLN. Then, a pathological color quality assessment (PCQA), which checked for the presence of the blue dye, was performed on the paraffin blocks of the nonmetastatic SLN. Six preoperative identifiable variables likely to influence the detection rate were examined.
RESULTS: The surgical detection (sd) rate was 84% (213 of 253) and the PCQA rate was 73% (185 of 253). Only breast size (sd, P = .0005; PCQA, P = .0007) and body mass index < or =30 (sd, P = .005; PCQA, P = .0007) were significant for SLN identification. Multivariate analysis revealed two independent factors influencing SLN identification: breast size (sd, P = .0001; PCQA, P = .002) and the timing of injection-injection prior to lumpectomy (sd, P = .04).
CONCLUSIONS: The optimal patient features for identifying the SLN by the patent blue dye method are small or medium-sized breasts, low body fat, and that the procedure is carried out prior to tumor excision. The PCQA offers a useful second assessment of the surgically removed SLN, introducing an independent element of quality control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11407519     DOI: 10.1007/s10434-001-0438-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  5 in total

1.  Clinical trial of combined radio- and fluorescence-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer.

Authors:  B E Schaafsma; F P R Verbeek; D D D Rietbergen; B van der Hiel; J R van der Vorst; G J Liefers; J V Frangioni; C J H van de Velde; F W B van Leeuwen; A L Vahrmeijer
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  The false-negative rate of sentinel node biopsy in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sarah Pesek; Taka Ashikaga; Lars Erik Krag; David Krag
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Randomized comparison of near-infrared fluorescence imaging using indocyanine green and 99(m) technetium with or without patent blue for the sentinel lymph node procedure in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Joost R van der Vorst; Boudewijn E Schaafsma; Floris P R Verbeek; Merlijn Hutteman; J Sven D Mieog; Clemens W G M Lowik; Gerrit-Jan Liefers; John V Frangioni; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Alexander L Vahrmeijer
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Value of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients with previous excisional biopsy.

Authors:  Gokhan Coskun; Lutfi Dogan; Niyazi Karaman; Cihangir Ozaslan; Can Atalay
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.588

5.  Severe anaphylactic reaction after blue dye injection for sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast surgery: Report of two cases and literature review.

Authors:  Maximos Frountzas; Charalampos Theodoropoulos; Panagiotis Karathanasis; Christina Nikolaou; Constantinos G Zografos; Andreas Larentzakis; George C Zografos; Nikolaos V Michalopoulos
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2021-05-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.