Literature DB >> 11407116

Microbial molecular chaperones.

P A Lund1.   

Abstract

Protein folding in the cell, long thought to be a spontaneous process, in fact often requires the assistance of molecular chaperones. This is thought to be largely because of the danger of incorrect folding and aggregation of proteins, which is a particular problem in the crowded environment of the cell. Molecular chaperones are involved in numerous processes in bacterial cells, including assisting the folding of newly synthesized proteins, both during and after translation; assisting in protein secretion, preventing aggregation of proteins on heat shock, and repairing proteins that have been damaged or misfolded by stresses such as a heat shock. Within the cell, a balance has to be found between refolding of proteins and their proteolytic degradation, and molecular chaperones play a key role in this. In this review, the evidence for the existence and role of the major cytoplasmic molecular chaperones will be discussed, mainly from the physiological point of view but also in relationship to their known structure, function and mechanism of action. The two major chaperone systems in bacterial cells (as typified by Escherichia coli) are the GroE and DnaK chaperones, and the contrasting roles and mechanisms of these chaperones will be presented. The GroE chaperone machine acts by providing a protected environment in which protein folding of individual protein molecules can proceed, whereas the DnaK chaperones act by binding and protecting exposed regions on unfolded or partially folded protein chains. DnaK chaperones interact with trigger factor in protein translation and with ClpB in reactivating proteins which have become aggregated after heat shock. The nature of the other cytoplasmic chaperones in the cell will also be reviewed, including those for which a clear function has not yet been determined, and those where an in vivo chaperone function has still to be proven, such as the small heat shock proteins IbpA and IbpB. The regulation of expression of the genes of the heat shock response will also be discussed, particularly in the light of the signals that are needed to induce the response. The major signals for induction of the heat shock response are elevated temperature and the presence of unfolded protein within the cell, but these are sensed and transduced differently by different bacteria. The best characterized example is the sigma 32 subunit of RNA polymerase from E. coli, which is both more efficiently translated and also transiently stabilized following heat shock. The DnaK chaperones modulate this effect. However, a more widely conserved system appears to be typified by the HrcA repressor in Bacillus subtilis, the activity of which is modulated by the GroE chaperone machine. Other examples of regulation of molecular chaperones will also be discussed. Finally, the likely future research directions for molecular chaperone biology in the post-genomic era will be briefly evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11407116     DOI: 10.1016/s0065-2911(01)44012-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Microb Physiol        ISSN: 0065-2911            Impact factor:   3.517


  66 in total

1.  A new native EcHsp31 structure suggests a key role of structural flexibility for chaperone function.

Authors:  Paulene M Quigley; Konstantin Korotkov; François Baneyx; Wim G J Hol
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  The DnaK chaperone is necessary for alpha-complementation of beta-galactosidase in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Nicolas Lopes Ferreira; Jean-Hervé Alix
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  The protein encoded at the 3' end of the serine protease gene of Aeromonas sobria functions as a chaperone in the production of the protease.

Authors:  Tomohiko Nomura; Yoshio Fujii; Hiroyasu Yamanaka; Hidetomo Kobayashi; Keinosuke Okamoto
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Removal of impurities from transcription factor preparations that alter their DNA-binding properties.

Authors:  Liping Sun; Thomas Kodadek
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Stress response gene regulation in Chlamydia is dependent on HrcA-CIRCE interactions.

Authors:  Adam C Wilson; Ming Tan
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Global transcriptional analysis of the phosphate starvation response in Sinorhizobium meliloti strains 1021 and 2011.

Authors:  E Krol; A Becker
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 3.291

7.  Error-prone DNA polymerase IV is regulated by the heat shock chaperone GroE in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Jill C Layton; Patricia L Foster
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Understanding biology by reverse engineering the control.

Authors:  Claire J Tomlin; Jeffrey D Axelrod
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Proteomic characterization of Yersinia pestis virulence.

Authors:  Brett A Chromy; Megan W Choi; Gloria A Murphy; Arlene D Gonzales; Chris H Corzett; Brian C Chang; J Patrick Fitch; Sandra L McCutchen-Maloney
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Transcriptional heat shock response in the smallest known self-replicating cell, Mycoplasma genitalium.

Authors:  Oxana Musatovova; Subramanian Dhandayuthapani; Joel B Baseman
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.