N A Rigotti1, M R Munafo, M F Murphy, L F Stead. 1. ICRF General Practice Research Group, Institute of Health Sciences, Old Road, Headington, Oxford, UK, OX3 7LF. marcus.munafo@dphpc.ox.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: An admission to hospital provides an opportunity to help people stop smoking. Individuals may be more open to help at a time of perceived vulnerability, and may find it easier to quit in an environment where smoking is restricted or prohibited. Providing smoking cessation services during hospitalisation may help more people to attempt and sustain a quit attempt. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of interventions for smoking cessation in hospitalised patients. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group register, CINAHL and the Smoking and Health database for studies of interventions for smoking cessation in hospitalised patients. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials of behavioural, pharmacological or multicomponent interventions to help patients stop smoking conducted with hospitalised patients who were current smokers or recent quitters. We excluded studies of patients admitted for psychiatric disorders or substance abuse, those that did not report abstinence rates and those with follow-up of less than six months. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors extracted data independently for each paper, with disagreements resolved by consensus. MAIN RESULTS: Intensive intervention (inpatient contact plus follow-up for at least one month) was associated with a significantly higher quit rate compared to control (Peto Odds Ratio 1.82, 95% CI 1.49-2.22). There was insufficient evidence to judge the effect of interventions delivered only during the hospital stay. Although the interventions increased quit rates irrespective of whether nicotine replacement therapy was used, the results for nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) were compatible with other data indicating that it increases quit rates. There was no strong evidence that clinical diagnosis affected the likelihood of quitting. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: High intensity behavioural interventions that include at least one month of follow-up contact are effective in promoting smoking cessation in hospitalised patients. The findings of the review were compatible with research in other settings showing that NRT increases quit rates.
BACKGROUND: An admission to hospital provides an opportunity to help people stop smoking. Individuals may be more open to help at a time of perceived vulnerability, and may find it easier to quit in an environment where smoking is restricted or prohibited. Providing smoking cessation services during hospitalisation may help more people to attempt and sustain a quit attempt. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of interventions for smoking cessation in hospitalised patients. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group register, CINAHL and the Smoking and Health database for studies of interventions for smoking cessation in hospitalised patients. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials of behavioural, pharmacological or multicomponent interventions to help patients stop smoking conducted with hospitalised patients who were current smokers or recent quitters. We excluded studies of patients admitted for psychiatric disorders or substance abuse, those that did not report abstinence rates and those with follow-up of less than six months. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors extracted data independently for each paper, with disagreements resolved by consensus. MAIN RESULTS: Intensive intervention (inpatient contact plus follow-up for at least one month) was associated with a significantly higher quit rate compared to control (Peto Odds Ratio 1.82, 95% CI 1.49-2.22). There was insufficient evidence to judge the effect of interventions delivered only during the hospital stay. Although the interventions increased quit rates irrespective of whether nicotine replacement therapy was used, the results for nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) were compatible with other data indicating that it increases quit rates. There was no strong evidence that clinical diagnosis affected the likelihood of quitting. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: High intensity behavioural interventions that include at least one month of follow-up contact are effective in promoting smoking cessation in hospitalised patients. The findings of the review were compatible with research in other settings showing that NRT increases quit rates.
Authors: Judith S Gordon; E Melinda Mahabee-Gittens; Judy A Andrews; Steven M Christiansen; David J Byron Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2013-01-14 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Theo van Achterberg; Getty G J Huisman-de Waal; Nicole A B M Ketelaar; Rob A Oostendorp; Johanna E Jacobs; Hub C H Wollersheim Journal: Health Promot Int Date: 2010-08-25 Impact factor: 2.483