M Bigby1. 1. Department of Dermatology, Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA.mbigby@caregroup.harvard.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the validity, magnitude, precision, and applicability of data on the rates at which drugs cause adverse cutaneous reactions. DESIGN: Systematic review of the medical literature. DATA SOURCE: The MEDLINE database was searched (1966-August 2000) for studies that contain information on the rates of cutaneous reactions to drugs. The bibliographies of retrieved articles and review articles were also examined to find relevant studies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Studies that included primary data on cutaneous reaction rates to drugs were evaluated for their validity, magnitude, precision, and applicability, using guidelines derived from existing guidelines for the evaluation of articles about harm and prognosis. RESULTS: Nine studies met the study criteria. Five of the studies were based on prospectively collected data on medical inpatients, 2 were retrospective studies based on chart or computerized medical record review, and 2 were based on spontaneous reports and consumption data. The morbilliform drug exanthem and urticaria were the most common cutaneous reactions to drugs. Reaction rates varied from 0% to 8% and were highest for antibiotics (in the range of 1% to 8% for several classes of antibiotics). CONCLUSIONS: Despite differences in the methods of the studies reviewed and their time of execution, there is remarkable agreement in the results. Reaction rates (and 95% confidence intervals) are available for many commonly used drugs.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the validity, magnitude, precision, and applicability of data on the rates at which drugs cause adverse cutaneous reactions. DESIGN: Systematic review of the medical literature. DATA SOURCE: The MEDLINE database was searched (1966-August 2000) for studies that contain information on the rates of cutaneous reactions to drugs. The bibliographies of retrieved articles and review articles were also examined to find relevant studies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Studies that included primary data on cutaneous reaction rates to drugs were evaluated for their validity, magnitude, precision, and applicability, using guidelines derived from existing guidelines for the evaluation of articles about harm and prognosis. RESULTS: Nine studies met the study criteria. Five of the studies were based on prospectively collected data on medical inpatients, 2 were retrospective studies based on chart or computerized medical record review, and 2 were based on spontaneous reports and consumption data. The morbilliform drug exanthem and urticaria were the most common cutaneous reactions to drugs. Reaction rates varied from 0% to 8% and were highest for antibiotics (in the range of 1% to 8% for several classes of antibiotics). CONCLUSIONS: Despite differences in the methods of the studies reviewed and their time of execution, there is remarkable agreement in the results. Reaction rates (and 95% confidence intervals) are available for many commonly used drugs.
Authors: L Gallelli; M Colosimo; D Pirritano; M Ferraro; S De Fazio; N M Marigliano; G De Sarro Journal: Clin Drug Investig Date: 2007 Impact factor: 2.859
Authors: Martina Sanlorenzo; Igor Vujic; Adil Daud; Alain Algazi; Matthew Gubens; Sara Alcántara Luna; Kevin Lin; Pietro Quaglino; Klemens Rappersberger; Susana Ortiz-Urda Journal: JAMA Dermatol Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 10.282