Literature DB >> 11405356

Intraoperative evaluation of blood flow in the internal mammary or thoracodorsal artery as a recipient vessel for a free TRAM flap.

F Lorenzetti1, H Kuokkanen, K von Smitten, S Asko-Seljavaara.   

Abstract

Although the free microvascular transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap is in routine use for breast reconstruction, little is known of its hemodynamics. The purpose of this study was to determine whether any differences exist when the free TRAM flap is anastomosed to the thoracodorsal or internal mammary vessels. The study comprised 25 patients receiving a free TRAM flap for breast reconstruction. The thoracodorsal vessels were used as recipients in 21 patients and the internal mammary vessels were used in 4 patients. Blood flow rate was measured directly in the donor and recipient arteries, and after anastomosis by a transit-time ultrasonic flowmeter (CardioMed). Two- and 3-mm probes were used. The blood flow rate in the donor artery (deep inferior epigastric) before flap dissection was 11 +/- 6 ml per minute (mean +/- standard deviation). The rate was significantly (p < 0.05) lower (5 +/- 3 ml per minute) in the recipient thoracodorsal artery than in the donor, but after transplantation it increased to 14 +/- 5 ml per minute (p < 0.05), attaining the same value as the donor artery. The blood flow rate in the intact internal mammary artery was significantly higher (25 +/- 10 ml per minute) than in the donor and thoracodorsal arteries, but after anastomosis it dropped to the same value (12 +/- 3 ml per minute; p < 0.05) as the donor artery. The intake of blood in TRAM flaps supplied by the intemal mammary artery seems to be no greater than that in free flaps anastomosed to thoracodorsal vessels, although the flow in the internal mammary artery was much higher. The authors concluded that the blood supply in a free TRAM flap is independent of the flow in the recipient artery and that thoracodorsal vessels, although often in a scarred bed and radiated, are as suitable for anastomosing a free TRAM flap as are internal mammary vessels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11405356     DOI: 10.1097/00000637-200106000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  9 in total

Review 1.  Achieving autologous breast reconstruction for breast cancer patients in the setting of post-mastectomy radiotherapy.

Authors:  Namrata S Anavekar; Warren M Rozen; Cara M Le Roux; Mark W Ashton
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 4.442

2.  Internal mammary usability as recipient vessels in DIEP breast reconstruction in the setting of previous radiation.

Authors:  William Leppard; Thomas Pomposelli; Eric I Chang; Ahmed Suliman; Fernando Herrera
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 3.  Revisiting the internal mammaries as recipient vessels in breast reconstruction: considerations in current practice.

Authors:  Steven M Sultan; Amanda M Rizzo; Heather A Erhard; Teresa Benacquista; Katie E Weichman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Anticoagulative strategies in reconstructive surgery--clinical significance and applicability.

Authors:  Andreas Jokuszies; Christian Herold; Andreas D Niederbichler; Peter M Vogt
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2012-01-17

5.  Quantifying Blood Flow in the DIEP Flap: An Ultrasonographic Study.

Authors:  Joseph Richard Dusseldorp; David G Pennington
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2014-11-07

6.  Comparative Perfusion Analysis of Free Muscle-Sparing Versus Pedicle Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous (TRAM) Flaps in Vivo in the Peri-Operative and Late Post-Operative Periods.

Authors:  Richard McNally; Jonathan Rimler; Vincent Laurence; Keyianoosh Z Paydar; Garrett A Wirth
Journal:  World J Plast Surg       Date:  2017-05

7.  Incidental finding of subclavian artery occlusion and subsequent hypoplastic internal mammary artery as a candidate recipient vessel in DIEP flap breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Ik Hyun Seong; Kyong-Je Woo
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2019-08-30

8.  Reply to: "When to assess the flap perfusion by intraoperative indocyanine green angiography (ICGA): On the donor site or the recipient site?"

Authors:  Paloma Malagón; Cristian Carrasco; Oihane García; María Del-Río; Carmen Higueras
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 4.380

9.  Intraoperative Blood Flow Analysis of DIEP vs. ms-TRAM Flap Breast Reconstruction Combining Transit-Time Flowmetry and Microvascular Indocyanine Green Angiography.

Authors:  Alexander Geierlehner; Raymund E Horch; Ingo Ludolph; Andreas Arkudas
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-03-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.