PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to compare the effects of a brief period (20 min) of intravenous (IV) fluid rehydration and oral (ORAL) rehydration on ratings of perceived exertion (RPE), thirst, and thermal sensation (TS) during exercise in the heat. METHODS: After dehydration (-4% of body weight), eight nonacclimated highly trained cyclists (age = 24 +/- 1 yr; VO2 = 61.4 +/- 0.8 mL.kg.min-1) performed three experimental trials. Rehydration (randomized, cross-over design) included: 1) ORAL (0.45% NaCl) equal to 50% of prior dehydration; 2) IV (0.45% NaCl) equal to 50% of prior dehydration; and 3) a control (CON), no fluid trial. Subjects then cycled at 74% VO2peak until volitional exhaustion in a hot environment (37 degrees C). RESULTS:Central (C-), local (L-), andoverall-RPE (O-RPE) were significantly higher in CON compared to ORAL and IV at minutes 5 and 15 of exercise. C-RPE responses at minute 5 of exercise were lower (P < 0.05) during ORAL compared with IV, and C-RPE and O-RPE responses at minute 15 were lower (P < 0.05) during ORAL compared with IV. TS responses during CON were higher (P < 0.05) than ORAL and IV at minute 5, and TS was higher (P < 0.05) during IV versus ORAL at minute 15. TS were significantly correlated with all RPE responses at minute 15 in all trials. Thirst ratings were lower (P < 0.05) during ORAL compared with CON and IV at minutes 0, 5, and 15. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that ORAL resulted in lower RPE, thirst, and TS compared with CON and IV during exercise in the heat.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to compare the effects of a brief period (20 min) of intravenous (IV) fluid rehydration and oral (ORAL) rehydration on ratings of perceived exertion (RPE), thirst, and thermal sensation (TS) during exercise in the heat. METHODS: After dehydration (-4% of body weight), eight nonacclimated highly trained cyclists (age = 24 +/- 1 yr; VO2 = 61.4 +/- 0.8 mL.kg.min-1) performed three experimental trials. Rehydration (randomized, cross-over design) included: 1) ORAL (0.45% NaCl) equal to 50% of prior dehydration; 2) IV (0.45% NaCl) equal to 50% of prior dehydration; and 3) a control (CON), no fluid trial. Subjects then cycled at 74% VO2peak until volitional exhaustion in a hot environment (37 degrees C). RESULTS: Central (C-), local (L-), and overall-RPE (O-RPE) were significantly higher in CON compared to ORAL and IV at minutes 5 and 15 of exercise. C-RPE responses at minute 5 of exercise were lower (P < 0.05) during ORAL compared with IV, and C-RPE and O-RPE responses at minute 15 were lower (P < 0.05) during ORAL compared with IV. TS responses during CON were higher (P < 0.05) than ORAL and IV at minute 5, and TS was higher (P < 0.05) during IV versus ORAL at minute 15. TS were significantly correlated with all RPE responses at minute 15 in all trials. Thirst ratings were lower (P < 0.05) during ORAL compared with CON and IV at minutes 0, 5, and 15. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that ORAL resulted in lower RPE, thirst, and TS compared with CON and IV during exercise in the heat.
Authors: Simon Piet van Rosendal; Mark Andrew Osborne; Robert Gordon Fassett; Bill Lancashire; Jeff Scott Coombes Journal: Sports Med Date: 2010-04-01 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: David Hostler; Michael Gallagher; Fredric L Goss; Jennifer R Seitz; Steven E Reis; Robert J Robertson; William E Northington; Joe Suyama Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2008-11-27 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Evan C Johnson; Matthew S Ganio; Elaine C Lee; Rebecca M Lopez; Brendon P McDermott; Douglas J Casa; Carl M Maresh; Lawrence E Armstrong Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2010 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Douglas J Casa; Rebecca L Stearns; Rebecca M Lopez; Matthew S Ganio; Brendon P McDermott; Susan Walker Yeargin; Linda M Yamamoto; Stephanie M Mazerolle; Melissa W Roti; Lawrence E Armstrong; Carl M Maresh Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2010 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Scott Allen; Kevin C Miller; Jay Albrecht; Julie Garden-Robinson; Elizabeth Blodgett-Salafia Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2013-08-16 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Asker E Jeukendrup; Shaun Hopkins; Luis Fernando Aragón-Vargas; Carl Hulston Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2008-09-24 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: David Hostler; James C Bednez; Sarah Kerin; Steven E Reis; Pui Wah Kong; Julia Morley; Michael Gallagher; Joe Suyama Journal: Prehosp Emerg Care Date: 2010 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: Brendon P McDermott; Douglas J Casa; Elaine Lee; Linda Yamamoto; Kathleen Beasley; Holly Emmanuel; Jeffrey Anderson; Linda Pescatello; Lawrence E Armstrong; Carl Maresh Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2013-10-23 Impact factor: 2.860