Literature DB >> 11404670

Running mileage, movement mileage, and fitness in male U.S. Navy recruits.

T V Trank1, D H Ryman, R Y Minagawa, D W Trone, R A Shaffer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a relationship between overall fitness improvement and varying amounts of running and movement mileage.
METHODS: Subjects were male U.S. Navy recruits (N = 1703, 25 divisions), ages 17-35 yr (mean age = 20.1 +/- 2.9 yr), who attended boot camp from April 1996 through August 1996. During the first week of training, recruits performed a 1.5-mile run to determine baseline fitness levels. The results from the initial run were compared with a final 1.5-mile run conducted 6 wk later.
RESULTS: Based on an age-adjusted fitness scale for a 1.5-mile run time, about one third of the recruits began recruit training in "Excellent-Superior" condition (N = 558), one third began in "Good" condition (N = 582), and one third began in "Poor-Fair" condition (N = 563). Running mileage among divisions ranged from 11.5 to 43.5 miles for the entire 7-wk training period (mean = 22.7 +/- 7.2 miles; 8-22 run days, mean = 13 +/- 4 d). In addition to running, the divisions accumulated many movement miles (110-202 miles; mean = 145 +/- 26 miles) while marching in formation. Recruits who began training in Poor-Fair condition improved the most with an average decrease in run time of 1:55 +/- 1:06 min (15.6% improvement). The Good group improved by 47 +/- 37 s (7.3% improvement), and the Excellent-Superior group improved by 17 +/- 32 s (2.9% improvement).
CONCLUSION: The magnitude of fitness improvement, as measured by run time improvement, was directly related to baseline fitness level but not related to movement mileage or high-intensity run mileage accrued during training.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11404670     DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200106000-00024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  8 in total

Review 1.  Physical fitness profiles of young men: associations between physical fitness, obesity and health.

Authors:  Heikki Kyröläinen; Matti Santtila; Bradley C Nindl; Tommi Vasankari
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Quantification of Recruit Training Demands and Subjective Wellbeing during Basic Military Training.

Authors:  Sean Bulmer; Jace R Drain; Jamie L Tait; Sean L Corrigan; Paul B Gastin; Brad Aisbett; Timo Rantalainen; Luana C Main
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Profiling the injuries of law enforcement recruits during academy training: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Danny J Maupin; Elisa F D Canetti; Ben Schram; Robert G Lockie; J Jay Dawes; Joseph M Dulla; Rob M Orr
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-07-20

4.  Influence of an injury reduction program on injury and fitness outcomes among soldiers.

Authors:  J J Knapik; S H Bullock; S Canada; E Toney; J D Wells; E Hoedebecke; B H Jones
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.399

5.  Effects of diet, physical activity and performance, and body weight on incident gout in ostensibly healthy, vigorously active men.

Authors:  Paul T Williams
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Physical fitness and nutritional status of polish ground force unit recruits.

Authors:  A Tomczak; J Bertrandt; A Kłos
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 2.806

7.  Physical Fitness Characteristics That Relate to Work Sample Test Battery Performance in Law Enforcement Recruits.

Authors:  Robert G Lockie; J Jay Dawes; Katherine Balfany; Ciara E Gonzales; Maria M Beitzel; Joseph M Dulla; Robin M Orr
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  The Influence of Physical Fitness on Reasons for Academy Separation in Law Enforcement Recruits.

Authors:  Robert G Lockie; Katherine Balfany; Ashley M Bloodgood; Matthew R Moreno; Karly A Cesario; Joseph M Dulla; J Jay Dawes; Robin M Orr
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.