Literature DB >> 11404659

Estimating energy expenditure by heart-rate monitoring without individual calibration.

K L Rennie1, S J Hennings, J Mitchell, N J Wareham.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Heart rate monitoring has been shown to be a valid method for measuring free-living energy expenditure at the group level, but its use in large-scale studies is limited by the need for an individual calibration of the relationship between heart rate and energy expenditure.
PURPOSE: To determine whether energy expenditure can be estimated from heart rate monitoring without individual calibration in epidemiological studies.
METHODS: Our previously validated heart rate monitoring method relies on measuring individual calibration parameters obtained from resting energy expenditure and the regression line between energy expenditure and heart rate during exercise. We developed prediction equations for these parameters using easily measured variables in a population-based study of 789 individuals. The predictive ability of these parameters was tested in a separate population-based sample (N = 97).
RESULTS: Physical activity level (PAL = total energy expenditure/basal metabolic rate) using the four estimated parameters was correlated with PAL using the measured parameters (r = 0.82, P < 0.01). Comparison of measured and estimated PAL showed that 97.9% of the scores were placed in the same or adjacent quartile.
CONCLUSION: A combination of simple measurements and heart rate monitoring produces estimates of energy expenditure that are highly correlated with those obtained using full individual calibration. This simplification of the heart rate monitoring method could extend its use in ranking individuals in epidemiological studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11404659     DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200106000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  6 in total

1.  Evaluating physiological signal salience for estimating metabolic energy cost from wearable sensors.

Authors:  Kimberly A Ingraham; Daniel P Ferris; C David Remy
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2019-01-10

Review 2.  The ActivityStat hypothesis: the concept, the evidence and the methodologies.

Authors:  Sjaan R Gomersall; Alex V Rowlands; Coralie English; Carol Maher; Tim S Olds
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Quantification of the Capacity for Cold-Induced Thermogenesis in Young Men With and Without Obesity.

Authors:  Robert J Brychta; Shan Huang; Juan Wang; Brooks P Leitner; Jacob D Hattenbach; Sarah L Bell; Laura A Fletcher; Rachel Perron Wood; Christopher R Idelson; Courtney J Duckworth; Suzanne McGehee; Amber B Courville; Shanna B Bernstein; Marc L Reitman; Aaron M Cypess; Kong Y Chen
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  Accuracy of optimized branched algorithms to assess activity-specific physical activity energy expenditure.

Authors:  Andy G Edwards; James O Hill; William C Byrnes; Raymond C Browning
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  The Validity and Inter-Rater Reliability of a Video-Based Posture-Matching Tool to Estimate Cumulative Loads on the Lower Back.

Authors:  Saeed Ghaneh-Ezabadi; Mohammad Abdoli-Eramaki; Navid Arjmand; Alireza Abouhossein; Seyed Abolfazl Zakerian
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2022-08-01

6.  Simple Prediction of Metabolic Equivalents of Daily Activities Using Heart Rate Monitor without Calibration of Individuals.

Authors:  Yuko Caballero; Takafumi J Ando; Satoshi Nakae; Chiyoko Usui; Tomoko Aoyama; Motofumi Nakanishi; Sho Nagayoshi; Yoko Fujiwara; Shigeho Tanaka
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.