Antisense cyclin D1 enhances sensitivity of head and neck cancer cells to cisplatin.

OBJECTIVES: Cyclin D1 is a cell cycle regulatory factor that modulates a critical step in cell cycle control. Cyclin D1 is overexpressed in a significant proportion of head and neck cancers and correlates with a poor prognosis. Abrogation of cyclin D1 action through antisense cyclin D1 shows promise as an antitumor therapy, with an inhibitory effect in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma both in vitro and in vivo. The suppressive effect of antisense cyclin D1 in head and neck cancer xenografts in nude mice is incomplete, however, suggesting that combination with another antitumor agent is necessary for complete tumor eradication. Cisplatin is a widely used chemotherapeutic agent in head and neck cancer, and is particularly effective in combination with radiation therapy. In this study, we investigate whether antisense cyclin D1 enhances the sensitivity of head and neck cancer cells to cisplatin. Such an enhancement of sensitivity would suggest that combination therapy using antisense cyclin D1 and cisplatin would be an effective treatment modality for head and neck cancer. STUDY
DESIGN: Antisense cyclin D1 was transfected into the head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell line CCL23 using a plasmid vector. Both the parental CCL23 cells and the antisense cyclin D1-transfected CCL23 cells (CCL23AS) were treated with cisplatin at increasing concentrations. The dosage of cisplatin ranged from 1 microg/mL to 10 microg/mL. Initial exposure to cisplatin was for 2 hours, with increasing exposure times in succeeding experiments. Cell viability assays were done following cisplatin exposure. Dose response curves for the two cell lines were plotted and compared. Western blot analyses were done on the cisplatin-treated cell lines to determine levels of cyclin D1 expression.
RESULTS: Increasing concentrations of cisplatin resulted in significantly higher rates of cell killing in the antisense cyclin D1-transfected cells than in the parental cells. The ID50 values for the parental CCL23 cells and the antisense cyclin D1-transfected CCL23 cells were 7 microg/mL and 3 microg/mL, respectively, indicating significant enhancement of sensitivity to cisplatin in the antisense cyclin D1-transfected cells. Western blot analyses demonstrated decreased expression of cyclin D1 in the CCL23AS cells with increasing doses of cisplatin, compared with the parental CCL23 cells.
CONCLUSIONS: Antisense cyclin D1-transfected CCL23 cells demonstrate an enhanced sensitivity to the effects of cisplatin compared with the parental cell line. Although the mechanism for this phenomenon is not completely understood, the data suggests the potential use of combination therapy using antisense cyclin D1 and cisplatin for head and neck cancers. While neither agent alone can completely eradicate head and neck cancers, the synergistic effect of the two may be an effective therapeutic protocol for refractory head and neck cancers. Future investigation into the combination of antisense cyclin D1 with cisplatin for treatment of head and neck cancer is needed.