Literature DB >> 11403528

In vivo efficacy of two heated humidifiers used during CPAP-therapy for obstructive sleep apnea under various environmental conditions.

G H Wiest1, J Foerst, F S Fuchs, A H Schmelzer, E G Hahn, J H Ficker.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the humidification performance-defined as the maximum achievable absolute humidity in the CPAP tube-of two heated humidifier systems (HH) offered as CPAP accessories, as a function of ambient air conditions.
DESIGN: In 48 patients undergoing CPAP treatment, temperature (T) and relative humidity (RH) in the distal CPAP tube system were measured, with and without either of the two heated humidifiers A (HH-A, n=23), or B (HH-B, n=25), until a steady state was achieved. At the same time, ambient T and RH in the examination room were recorded. T and RH were used to calculate the absolute humidity (AH).
SETTING: University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany. PATICIPANTS: 48 patients with obstructive sleep apnea undergoing CPAP therapy.
INTERVENTIONS: N/A. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: Conditions in the examination room during measurement with the HH-A, T = 22.5+2.1 (16.4-26.0) degrees C and AH = 9.3+2.4 (5.3-13.9) g/m3 did not differ significantly from those prevailing during measurements with the HH-B, T = 22.9+1.9 (18.9-26.3) degrees C and AH = 9.9+2.8 (6.2-16.4) g/m3. The mean humidification performance (steady state AH with HH within the CPAP tube) of the HH-A was 23.5+2.9 (19.1-29.9) g/m3, that of the HH-B 26.8+3.9 (21.0-34.4) g/m3.
CONCLUSIONS: Under the ambient conditions of humidity and temperature, commonly found in European and North American bedrooms, both HH demonstrate a high humidification performance that even falls within the range recommended for intubated patients. The difference between the two HH is small, and probably not clinical relevant. Thus, it would appear that both HH are suitable for the treatment of dry upper airways under CPAP therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11403528     DOI: 10.1093/sleep/24.4.435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sleep        ISSN: 0161-8105            Impact factor:   5.849


  5 in total

Review 1.  Clinical review: humidifiers during non-invasive ventilation--key topics and practical implications.

Authors:  Antonio M Esquinas Rodriguez; Raffaele Scala; Arie Soroksky; Ahmed BaHammam; Alan de Klerk; Arschang Valipour; Davide Chiumello; Claude Martin; Anne E Holland
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 9.097

2.  Water content of delivered gases during non-invasive ventilation in healthy subjects.

Authors:  François Lellouche; Salvatore Maurizio Maggiore; Aissam Lyazidi; Nicolas Deye; Solenne Taillé; Laurent Brochard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Physiotherapy for cystic fibrosis in Australia and New Zealand: A clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Brenda M Button; Christine Wilson; Ruth Dentice; Narelle S Cox; Anna Middleton; Esta Tannenbaum; Jennifer Bishop; Robyn Cobb; Kate Burton; Michelle Wood; Fiona Moran; Ryan Black; Summar Bowen; Rosemary Day; Julie Depiazzi; Katherine Doiron; Michael Doumit; Tiffany Dwyer; Alison Elliot; Louise Fuller; Kathleen Hall; Matthew Hutchins; Melinda Kerr; Annemarie L Lee; Christina Mans; Lauren O'Connor; Ranjana Steward; Angela Potter; Tshepo Rasekaba; Rebecca Scoones; Ben Tarrant; Nathan Ward; Samantha West; Dianne White; Lisa Wilson; Jamie Wood; Anne E Holland
Journal:  Respirology       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 6.424

4.  Assessment of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in healthy young volunteers using salivary stress biomarkers.

Authors:  Yuri Fueda; Fuka Matsuda; Takuya Kataoka
Journal:  Future Sci OA       Date:  2020-02-24

5.  Mask humidity during CPAP: influence of ambient temperature, heated humidification and heated tubing.

Authors:  Georg Nilius; Ulrike Domanski; Maik Schroeder; Holger Woehrle; Andrea Graml; Karl-Josef Franke
Journal:  Nat Sci Sleep       Date:  2018-05-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.