Literature DB >> 11403351

Non-invasive assessment of local arterial pulse pressure: comparison of applanation tonometry and echo-tracking.

L M Van Bortel1, E J Balkestein, J J van der Heijden-Spek, F H Vanmolkot, J A Staessen, J A Kragten, J W Vredeveld, M E Safar, H A Struijker Boudier, A P Hoeks.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Pulse pressure is not constant throughout the arterial tree. Use of pulse pressure at one arterial site as surrogate for pulse pressure at another arterial site may be erroneous. The present study compares three non-invasive techniques to measure local pulse pressure: (i) internally calibrated readings from applanation tonometry, (ii) alternative calibration of pressure waves obtained with applanation tonometry and (iii) alternative calibration of arterial distension waves obtained with echo-tracking. Alternative calibration assumes mean and diastolic blood pressure constant throughout the large artery tree. DESIGN AND METHODS: Study 1 used invasive measurements in the ascending aorta as a reference method and internally calibrated tonometer readings and alternatively calibrated pressure waves at the common carotid artery as test methods. Study 2 used alternatively calibrated pressure waves as a reference method and alternatively calibrated distension waves and internally calibrated applanation tonometer readings as test methods.
RESULTS: In study 1, pulse pressure from internally calibrated tonometer readings was 10.2+/-14.3 mmHg lower and pulse pressure from alternatively calibrated pressure waves was 1.8+/-5.2 mmHg higher than invasive pulse pressure. Pulse pressure from calibrated distension waves was 3.4+/-6.9 mmHg lower than pulse pressure from alternatively calibrated pressure waves. According to British Hypertension Society criteria, pulse pressure from the internally calibrated tonometer achieved grade D and pulse pressure from alternatively calibrated pressure waves achieved grade A. Pulse pressure from calibrated distension waves achieved grade B when alternatively calibrated pressure waves were used as a reference method.
CONCLUSIONS: Pulse pressure obtained from alternatively calibrated tonometer-derived pressure waves and echo-tracking-derived distension waves demonstrates good accuracy. Accuracy of pulse pressure from internally calibrated applanation tonometer readings at the carotid artery is poor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11403351     DOI: 10.1097/00004872-200106000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  49 in total

Review 1.  Noninvasive studies of central aortic pressure.

Authors:  Michael F O'Rourke; Audrey Adji
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.369

2.  Different effects of tocolytic medication on blood pressure and blood pressure amplification.

Authors:  Isabelle Fabry; Peter De Paepe; Jan Kips; Sebastian Vermeersch; Luc Van Bortel
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  The impact of ankle brachial index and pulse wave velocity on cardiovascular risk according to SCORE and Framingham scales and sex differences.

Authors:  L Woźnicka-Leśkiewicz; A Posadzy-Małaczyńska; R Juszkat
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.012

4.  Cuffless Blood Pressure Monitoring: Promises and Challenges.

Authors:  Jay A Pandit; Enrique Lores; Daniel Batlle
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  Paris Prospective Study III: a study of novel heart rate parameters, baroreflex sensitivity and risk of sudden death.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Empana; Kathy Bean; Catherine Guibout; Frédérique Thomas; Annie Bingham; Bruno Pannier; Pierre Boutouyrie; Xavier Jouven
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 8.082

6.  Central aortic pressure is independently associated with diastolic function.

Authors:  Sumeet Subherwal; Lisa de las Fuentes; Alan D Waggoner; Sharon Heuerman; Karen E Spence; Victor G Davila-Roman
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Left ventricular mass progression despite stable blood pressure and kidney function in stage 3 chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Michael E Seifert; Lisa de Las Fuentes; Charles Ginsberg; Marcos Rothstein; Dennis J Dietzen; Steven C Cheng; Will Ross; David Windus; Victor G Dávila-Román; Keith A Hruska
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.754

8.  Effect of Local Neck Anatomy on Localized One-Dimensional Measurements of Arterial Stiffness: A Finite-Element Model Study.

Authors:  Adriaan Campo; Matthew D McGarry; Thomas Panis; Joris Dirckx; Elisa Konofagou
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 2.097

9.  Clinical usefulness of wave intensity analysis.

Authors:  Motoaki Sugawara; Kiyomi Niki; Nobuyuki Ohte; Takashi Okada; Akimitsu Harada
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Rationale, design and population baseline characteristics of the PERFORM vascular project: an ancillary study of the Prevention of cerebrovascular and cardiovascular Events of ischemic origin with teRutroban in patients with a history oF ischemic strOke or tRansient ischeMic attack (PERFORM) trial.

Authors:  Michael G Hennerici; Michiel L Bots; Ian Ford; Stéphane Laurent; Pierre Jean Touboul
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.727

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.