Canadian Aboriginal communities and medical service patterns for the management of injured patients: a basis for surveillance.

Growing attention has been placed on injury as a major public health problem which has served to highlight the need for relevant injury data for preventive purposes at the community level. In the case of reserve-based Aboriginal communities in Canada, available injury data, from large datasets, often has little or no relevance at the community level. In addition, the availability of local data is complicated by unique health service and community infrastructures. As such, a prerequisite to establishing injury surveillance requires an understanding of Medical Service Patterns (MSPs) for injured patients intrinsic to a community's health service infrastructure. In determining patterns, cultural and environmental contexts are integral to methodological considerations as historically, Canada's Aboriginal population has been 'controlled' by others in the areas of health, education and social services. The objective of the study was to investigate MSPs in a Canadian Aboriginal community, specific to the management of injured patients, for the purpose of identifying data sites, sources, and collectors. The method relied on a four-step qualitative process designed explicitly for the study community, comprising: (1) semi-structured interviews with key informants; (2) a flow diagram process; (3) focus group discussions; and (4) a summary matrix diagram. This methodology was later replicated with three additional pilot communities. Three major MSPs were identified from nine original patterns generated through the initial data collection process. MSPs were found to be most directly impacted by severity of injury and the proximity of health service providers. Data collection practices were inconsistent, sporadic and poorly coordinated. Data was exclusive to respective data sources and off-reserve documentation was not reported back to the community. MSPs identified key data sites, sources, and collectors relevant to the study population. In conclusion, the four-step qualitative methodology employed in the study was found to be reliable and feasible in identifying community MSPs. Empirical findings confirm the need to investigate MSPs in communities considering surveillance activities, as intra-national differences may be considerable given social inequalities, geographic uniqueness and cultural factors. The use of sophisticated methodologies may detract rather than promote collaborative efforts.