Literature DB >> 11402250

Body composition profiles of elite American heptathletes.

L Houtkoopr1, V A Mullins, S B Going, C H Brown, T G Lohman.   

Abstract

This study characterized body composition profiles of elite American heptathletes and cross-validated skinfold (SKF) and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) field method equations for estimation of percent body fat (%Fat) using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as the criterion. Weight, height, fat mass (FM), fat-free mass (FFM), bone mineral density (BMD), and %Fat were measured in 19 heptathletes using standard measurement protocols for DXA, SKFs and BIA. The ages, heights, and weights were respectively 25.5 +/- 3.5 years, 175.0 +/- 6.6 cm, 67.3 +/- 7.1 kg. DXA estimates of mean +/- SD values for body composition variables were 57.2 +/- 6.1 kg FFM, 10.1 +/- 2.6 kg FM, 114 +/- 7% BMD for age/racial reference group, and 15 +/- 3.0 %Fat. Ranges of bias values for %Fat (DXA minus SKF or BIA) were, respectively, -0.5 to 1.6% and -5.5 to -1.2%. Ranges for standard errors of estimate and total errors were, respectively, SKF 2.4-2.5%, 2.4 - 2.8% and BIA 3.0%, 5.0-6.5%. Regression analyses of the field methods on DXA were significant (p < .05) for all SKF equations but not BIA equations. This study demonstrates that elite American heptathletes are lean, have high levels of BMD, and that SKF equations provide more accurate estimates of %Fat relative to DXA than estimates from BIA equations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11402250     DOI: 10.1123/ijsnem.11.2.162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab        ISSN: 1526-484X            Impact factor:   4.599


  5 in total

1.  National Athletic Trainers' Association position statement: safe weight loss and maintenance practices in sport and exercise.

Authors:  Paula Sammarone Turocy; Bernard F DePalma; Craig A Horswill; Kathleen M Laquale; Thomas J Martin; Arlette C Perry; Marla J Somova; Alan C Utter
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Ultrasound techniques applied to body fat measurement in male and female athletes.

Authors:  Jean-Claude Pineau; Jean Robert Filliard; Michel Bocquet
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Bioelectrical impedance analysis versus reference methods in the assessment of body composition in athletes.

Authors:  Francesco Campa; Luis Alberto Gobbo; Silvia Stagi; Leticia Trindade Cyrino; Stefania Toselli; Elisabetta Marini; Giuseppe Coratella
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Body mass index and percentage of body fat as indicators for obesity in an adolescent athletic population.

Authors:  William C Etchison; Elizabeth A Bloodgood; Cholly P Minton; Nancy J Thompson; Mary Ann Collins; Stephen C Hunter; Hongying Dai
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.843

Review 5.  Come Back Skinfolds, All Is Forgiven: A Narrative Review of the Efficacy of Common Body Composition Methods in Applied Sports Practice.

Authors:  Andreas M Kasper; Carl Langan-Evans; James F Hudson; Thomas E Brownlee; Liam D Harper; Robert J Naughton; James P Morton; Graeme L Close
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 5.717

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.