Literature DB >> 11401718

Systematic mutagenesis of the DNA binding sites for SoxS in the Escherichia coli zwf and fpr promoters: identifying nucleotides required for DNA binding and transcription activation.

K L Griffith1, R E Wolf.   

Abstract

SoxS is the direct transcriptional activator of at least 15 genes of the Escherichia coli superoxide regulon. SoxS is small (107 amino acids), binds DNA as a monomer and recognizes a highly degenerate DNA binding site, termed 'soxbox'. Like other members of the AraC/XylS family, SoxS has two putative helix-turn-helix (HTH) DNA-binding motifs, and it has been proposed that each HTH motif recognizes a highly conserved recognition element of the soxbox. To determine which nucleotides are important for SoxS binding, we conducted a systematic mutagenesis of the DNA binding sites for SoxS in the zwf and fpr promoters and determined the effect of the soxbox mutations on SoxS DNA binding and transcription activation in vivo by measuring beta-galactosidase activity in strains with fusions to lacZ. We found that the sequences GCAC and CAAA, termed recognition elements 1 and 2 (RE 1 and RE 2), respectively, are critical for SoxS binding, as mutations within these elements severely hinder or eliminate SoxS-dependent transcription activation; substitutions within RE 2 (CAAA), however, are tolerated better than changes within RE 1 (GCAC). Although substitutions at the seven positions separating the two REs had only a modest effect on SoxS binding, AT basepairs were favoured within this 'spacer' region, presumably because, by facilitating DNA bending, they help bring the two recognition elements into proper juxtaposition. We also found that the 'invariant A' present at position 1 of 14/15 functional soxboxes identified thus far is important for SoxS binding, as a change to any other nucleotide at this position reduced SoxS-dependent transcription by approximately 50%. In addition, positions surrounding the REs seem to show a context effect, in that certain substitutions there have little or no effect when the RE has the optimal binding sequence, but produce a pronounced effect when the RE has a suboptimal sequence. We propose that these nucleotides play an important role in effecting differential expression from the various promoters. Lastly, we used gel retardation assays to show that alterations in transcription activation in vivo are caused by effects on DNA binding. Based on this exhaustive mutagenesis, we propose the following optimal sequence for SoxS binding: AnVGCACWWWnKRHCAAAHn (n = A, C, G, T; V = A, C, G; W = A, T; K = G, T; R = A, G; H = A, C, T).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11401718     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02456.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Microbiol        ISSN: 0950-382X            Impact factor:   3.501


  23 in total

1.  SoxRS down-regulation of rob transcription.

Authors:  Carmen Michán; Manuel Manchado; Carmen Pueyo
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  SoxRS-regulated expression and genetic analysis of the yggX gene of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Pablo J Pomposiello; Anastasia Koutsolioutsou; Daniel Carrasco; Bruce Demple
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 3.  Growing repertoire of AraC/XylS activators.

Authors:  Susan M Egan
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Promoter discrimination at class I MarA regulon promoters mediated by glutamic acid 89 of the MarA transcriptional activator of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Robert G Martin; Judah L Rosner
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Complex structure of the DNA-binding domain of AdpA, the global transcription factor in Streptomyces griseus, and a target duplex DNA reveals the structural basis of its tolerant DNA sequence specificity.

Authors:  Ming Dong Yao; Jun Ohtsuka; Koji Nagata; Ken-Ichi Miyazono; Yuehua Zhi; Yasuo Ohnishi; Masaru Tanokura
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  Virulence regulons of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli.

Authors:  George P Munson
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.829

7.  Activation of the Escherichia coli marA/soxS/rob regulon in response to transcriptional activator concentration.

Authors:  Robert G Martin; Emily S Bartlett; Judah L Rosner; Michael E Wall
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Vibrio cholerae ToxT independently activates the divergently transcribed aldA and tagA genes.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Withey; Victor J Dirita
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  RamA, a member of the AraC/XylS family, influences both virulence and efflux in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium.

Authors:  Andrew M Bailey; Al Ivens; Rob Kingsley; Jennifer L Cottell; John Wain; Laura J V Piddock
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Two functions of the C-terminal domain of Escherichia coli Rob: mediating "sequestration-dispersal" as a novel off-on switch for regulating Rob's activity as a transcription activator and preventing degradation of Rob by Lon protease.

Authors:  Kevin L Griffith; M Megan Fitzpatrick; Edward F Keen; Richard E Wolf
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.