Literature DB >> 11401459

A generalized adaptive dynamics framework can describe the evolutionary Ultimatum Game.

K M Page1, M A Nowak.   

Abstract

Adaptive dynamics describes the evolution of games where the strategies are continuous functions of some parameters. The standard adaptive dynamics framework assumes that the population is homogeneous at any one time. Differential equations point to the direction of the mutant that has maximum payoff against the resident population. The population then moves towards this mutant. The standard adaptive dynamics formulation cannot deal with games in which the payoff is not differentiable. Here we present a generalized framework which can. We assume that the population is not homogeneous but distributed around an average strategy. This approach can describe the long-term dynamics of the Ultimatum Game and also explain the evolution of fairness in a one-parameter Ultimatum Game. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11401459     DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.2000.2251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  12 in total

1.  Evolution of fairness in the one-shot anonymous Ultimatum Game.

Authors:  David G Rand; Corina E Tarnita; Hisashi Ohtsuki; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Blackmailing: the keystone in the human mating system.

Authors:  Milind G Watve; Anuja Damle; Bratati Ganguly; Anagha Kale; Neelesh Dahanukar
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.260

3.  Social learning in the ultimatum game.

Authors:  Boyu Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Random allocation of pies promotes the evolution of fairness in the Ultimatum Game.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Wang; Xiaojie Chen; Long Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Impact of roles assignation on heterogeneous populations in evolutionary dictator game.

Authors:  Xinyang Deng; Qi Liu; Rehan Sadiq; Yong Deng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Empathy emerges spontaneously in the ultimatum game: small groups and networks.

Authors:  Jaime Iranzo; Luis M Floría; Yamir Moreno; Angel Sánchez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Adaptive role switching promotes fairness in networked ultimatum game.

Authors:  Te Wu; Feng Fu; Yanling Zhang; Long Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  High-testosterone men reject low ultimatum game offers.

Authors:  Terence C Burnham
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Rational Constraints and the Evolution of Fairness in the Ultimatum Game.

Authors:  Damon Tomlin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Gene-culture interaction and the evolution of the human sense of fairness.

Authors:  Tru-Gin Liu; Yao Lu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.